[open-government] Long term preservation and archival for Open Data

Wed Oct 9 20:25:47 UTC 2013

I just wrote about this for
Sunlight<http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2013/10/02/government-apis-arent-a-backup-plan/>,
in part to further emphasize the value of bulk data (as opposed to a
strategy of RESTful APIs only). I think it's fair to argue that
preservation and archiving of government information is one of the use
cases that open data strategies consider.

I'm also interested in Max Ogden's dat <https://github.com/maxogden/dat> -
one of its chief goals is to make data easily syncable. Usually,
syncability in APIs comes at the cost of usability (when you have to
maintain state in the client of how much you've seen so far, throttle
requests, etc.). Pushing that complexity below the level where human
clients need to think about it would be helpful.

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Tree Martschink <treemartschink at gmail.com>wrote:

> I'm actually working on a related issue right now for DC Council,
> largely motivated by the possibility of the Uniform Electronic Legal
> Material Act becoming law in the District of Columbia.  We're
> exploring ways for the Council to begin directly publishing (that is,
> without a "publisher" such as Lexis or Westlaw) the official version
> of the DC Code, and along with it all the records that are part of the
> legislative process.   As a consequence, this will also require
> updating our current archiving solution to something other than Rows
> of Massive Filing Cabinets.
>
> The long and short of it is, this comes down to signatures and
> authentication.  Whether you're trying to introduce a PDF transcript
> of legislative testimony into evidence at trial, or use 10 years of
> JSON formatted procurement spending data for econometric analysis, if
> there's no way to verify the authenticity of the records, scraping and
> mirroring is a stopgap at best.
>
> All that is to say, the archiving issue is closely tied into custodial
> publication, and we've just begun exploring our options.  I'll be
> interested to hear what everyone has to say.
>
> Tree
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Ton Zijlstra <ton.zijlstra at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Interesting question Ivan!
> >
> > In general I think governments cannot be presumed to keep supplying data
> for
> > the sake of re-users only. For instance when the governments purpose for
> the
> > data collection no longer exists.
> >
> > There are however various scenarios where mirroring of data might make
> > sense:
> > Government bodies reneging on earlier open data commitments or taking
> steps
> > towards less transparency
> > Government shutdowns as in the US (unlikely elsewhere in the world)
> > Government bodies dissolving without transfer of data
> tasks/responsibilities
> > Budget cuts hitting open data provision
> > etc.
> >
> > A lot depends on the data itself as well. As archiving data may mean said
> > data is rapidly becoming useless / outdated, other than for archival
> > purposes themselves.
> > For other types of data having historic data may actually be more
> valuable
> > than just the current data. (e.g. I've been involved in a small project
> > where government only published todays values of data, but provided no
> > historic data, which we addressed by archiving the daily releases.)
> >
> > best,
> > Ton
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Interdependent Thoughts
> > Ton Zijlstra
> >
> > ton at tonzijlstra.eu
> > +31-6-34489360
> >
> > http://zylstra.org/blog
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Ivan Begtin <ibegtin at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear colleagues,
> >>    most of us are involved in open data activities and availability of
> >> opendata is critical issue when we want to re-use it.
> >>
> >> Right now we have a few examples when data, published earlier, disappear
> >> later.
> >> Sometimes it happens since data government information systems updated
> or
> >> closed, sometimes when "Government shutdown" happens (like data.govright
> >> now) and sometimes when government agencies disbanded.
> >>
> >> I know that where are some archival initiatives related to government
> >> websites. It's UK web archival initiative
> >> (http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/webarchive/) and similar projects
> in
> >> other countries (USA, Australia, Hong Kong and so on).
> >>
> >> As I understand no one such initiative covers datasets and when
> data.gov
> >> is unavailable the only chance to get the data is to look at other
> >> commerical/non-profit projects that re-publish data.gov datasets for
> own
> >> use.
> >>
> >> So I would like to launch discussion about long term preservation and
> >> archival for datasets published by government and not only government.
> >>
> >> What do you think from your experience in your countires, do we need to
> >> launch long term preservation or it's not an issue right now?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >>   Ivan Begtin
> >>
> >> Director of NGO "Informational Culture"
> >> email: ibegtin at infoculture.ru
> >> phone: +7 499 500 96 58, +7 910 426 68 83
> >> website: http://infoculture.ru
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> open-government mailing list
> >> open-government at lists.okfn.org
> >> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-government
> >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-government
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > open-government mailing list
> > open-government at lists.okfn.org
> > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-government
> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-government
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-government mailing list
> open-government at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-government
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-government
>

-- 
Developer | sunlightfoundation.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-government/attachments/20131009/0213fad6/attachment-0001.html>