[annotator-dev] Open Annotation support in Annotator
bigbluehat at hypothes.is
Fri Oct 10 21:08:20 UTC 2014
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Randall Leeds <tilgovi at hypothes.is> wrote:
> On Oct 10, 2014 11:17 AM, "Robert Sanderson" <azaroth42 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Proposals:
> > 1. Tags are about the target(s) of the Annotation, and are thus Bodies
> of the annotation.
> This is not likely to be terribly wrong for most use, I think. It also
> means we don't need to migrate existing annotations, extracting their tags
> and turning those into second order annotations.
> > 2. User holds the user name of the account, and thus the appropriate
> mapping is foaf:nick
> For our use at Hypothesis, the user field is a URI, not a string literal
> representing a foaf:nick.
Could the value of oa:annotatedBy not directly be the user URI in this case?
"The object of the [oa:annotatedBy] relationship is a resource that
identifies the agent responsible for creating the Annotation."
Is that overly simplified?
I hadn't realized all "implementation specific" FoaF properties were.
> If I have to override the context document, fine.
> But also worth pointing out that without the auth and permissions plugins
> there is no user field. If those components are optional, should the base
> context even include them?
> annotator-dev mailing list
> annotator-dev at lists.okfn.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/annotator-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the annotator-dev