[ckan-dev] Resolving CEP versus CREP naming

[David Read]

I'm leaning towards CREP.

Is it important to refer to them distinctly from tickets? Can we not
just use the ticket number, rather than have an additional CREP
number?

Also, the 'CREP status' field
(draft/accepted/rejected/completed/obseleted) can we not just use the
ticket status (new/assigned/invalid/fixed/wontfix). i.e. when a Crep
is accepted, assign it. So a Crep is essentially a more detailed
ticket/superticket.

David

On 11 May 2011 13:04, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Before we go any further with CEPs / CREPs can I propose we take the
> minor step of deciding on naming.
>
> I'd prefer CEP so I'm counting that as a +1. Please respond with your
> +1 / -1 / +0 / -0.
>
> Rufus
>
> PS: I note that before we started this CREP process we already have
> CEPs 0001-0005 in the ceps repo. Whichever way we go we will need to
> consolidate so please start all numbering above 0005 (I suggest Sebs
> foundational CEP/CREP be numbered 0000).
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
>