[ckan-dev] solr

Seb Bacon seb.bacon at okfn.org
Wed May 18 17:10:06 UTC 2011


Friedrich, would love to hear more detail, as those reasons also
pertain to postgres, no?!

Thanks,

Seb

On 18 May 2011 17:44, David Read <david.read at okfn.org> wrote:
> Rufus/Friedrich might want to chip in, but I believe original
> justification for it as a search backend was:
> * it's popular in open source
> * power and features are up there with the best
> * we have expertise in it (pudo)
> * a major client was interested in us using it (although this is no
> longer a constraint)
>
> David
>
> On 18 May 2011 17:32, Seb Bacon <seb.bacon at okfn.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was just wondering -- could someone with historical knowledge
>> explain what the original motivation was for integrating with solr?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Seb
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ckan-dev mailing list
>> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
>




More information about the ckan-dev mailing list