[ckan-dev] Search: uniqueKey when indexing
Rufus Pollock
rufus.pollock at okfn.org
Wed Nov 9 16:24:40 UTC 2011
Is it possible just to change the solr schema so it's "id" is dataset
id + site id? That would seem simpler than having to hash? Either way
does not seem a big deal.
Rufus
On 8 November 2011 18:29, David Read <david.read at okfn.org> wrote:
> I like this change to the schema.
>
> I guess we can just have migration script which rebuilds the search
> index for a CKAN instance when it is upgraded to the new schema?
>
> David
>
> 2011/11/8 Adrià Mercader <adria.mercader at okfn.org>:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As you may know, with some kind help from Rufus and Friedrich we
>> solved the issues with the IATI SOLR server [1] (A misconfiguration
>> issue made that both cores shared the same data dir).
>> While investigating the issue, I changed the indexing code and the
>> SOLR schema to use a generated hash as unique key instead of the
>> package id [2]. This turned out to be not relevant to the IATI issue,
>> but I think it might be worth keeping it and merging to default at
>> some point (not for 1.5!). Think e.g in a CKAN instance that harvests
>> records from another one and both share the same SOLR server.
>> The only problem is that schemas will need to be updated and indexes
>> rebuilt, so there will be some migration work to do.
>>
>> What do you guys think?
>>
>>
>> Adrià
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] http://trac.ckan.org/ticket/1430
>> [2] https://bitbucket.org/okfn/ckan/changeset/855f5a452f60
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ckan-dev mailing list
>> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
>
--
Co-Founder, Open Knowledge Foundation
Promoting Open Knowledge in a Digital Age
http://www.okfn.org/ - http://blog.okfn.org/
More information about the ckan-dev
mailing list