[ckan-dev] 2375-demo-theme code review

Tue Sep 11 15:02:51 UTC 2012

Hello,

I have looked over the code in the other sections that Ian was
supposed to review and am happy with them enough that we can merge
them. Maybe Ian can have a more thorough look another time when
looking over fanstatic/jinja2 code.

Thanks

David

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Toby Dacre <toby.okfn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 6 September 2012 10:36, Ian Murray <ian.c.murray at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Toby, much appreciated :-)  I'm not officially doing any ckan work
>> until next Thursday.  Can it wait til then?  If not, I'll try to find some
>> spare time one evening.
>>
>
> Ian,
>
> Hi, sorry this has somewhat been forced on us.  Maybe @kindly can give an
> opinion, we may have to do a post merge review which just breaks all our
> agreed processes.
>
> Toby
>
>>
>>  - Ian.
>>
>> On 5 September 2012 17:09, Toby Dacre <toby.okfn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ian,
>>>
>>> Just to say as you were not about and won't have much time, the fanstatic
>>> and jijna2 review (excluding lib/base.py, lib/render.py) is not a priority
>>> as they are self contained and can be looked at post any merge
>>>
>>> Toby
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ckan-dev mailing list
>>> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ckan-dev mailing list
>> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
>