[ckan-dev] python-dateutil requirement

[Dominik Moritz]

Hey Adria,

dateutil 2 is for Python 3 only. So yes, it's a hard limit. At least that's what the author says in [1]. I don't know how OWSLib can require dateutil 2.1 while being written for Python 2.

Cheers,
Dominik

[1] http://labix.org/python-dateutil#head-b57873b28af6ab8b1c4ae48d522ce0c691abbdf2


On 2 Aug 2013, at 18:53, Adrià Mercader <adria.mercader at okfn.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Does anybody know if the upper limit requirement for pyhton dateutil
> (2.0.0) is a hard one?
> 
> python-dateutil>=1.5.0,<2.0.0
> 
> It conflicts with one of the requirements of ckanext-spatial (OWSLib,
> which requires python-dateutil==2.1)
> 
> AFAICT this is the only place where we use it and doesn't look like it
> be affected by removing the upper limit.
> 
> https://github.com/okfn/ckan/blob/master/ckan/lib/search/index.py#L209
> 
> If there are no objections I will remove it, as it would be nice to
> include this in 2.1
> 
> 
> Adrià
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev

Dominik Moritz
CKAN developer  |  skype: d.moritz  |  @doobly_doo
The Open Knowledge Foundation
Empowering through Open Knowledge
http://okfn.org/  |  @okfn  |  http://ckan.org  |  @CKANproject

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-dev/attachments/20130802/612cf933/attachment-0001.sig>