[ckan-dev] IActions Interface

[Dominik Moritz]

Hi Toby,

On 13 May 2013, at 13:40, Toby Dacre <toby.okfn at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In the datastore the resource_show action is modified to add a couple
> of extra fields to the resource data dict.  Currently this is done by
> grabbing the original action function and wrapping it in a new one and
> then adding this to the actions functions.  This is extremely evil
> imho as we are using internal private variables to achieve this which
> should not be done in core let alone in an extension.
> 
> It does seem to be a legitimate need though.
> 
> Following discussion with David it feels like the best option may be
> to add a before_action(action_name, context, data_dict) and
> after_action(action_name, context, data_dict) methods.  It would be
> easy to add these and it feels useful. This would also solve a
> data.gov issue.
> 
> does anyone have a view on this?

What happens if there are two extensions that define a after_action? I think we should define that everything in after_action and before_action is commutative. The problem is that there is no way for us to make sure that it is, or is there?

> -- 
> Toby Dacre
> 
> The Open Knowledge Foundation
> 
> Empowering through Open Knowledge
> http://okfn.org/  |  @okfn
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev