[ckan-dev] ckanext-harvest: "There are no new harvesting jobs"
Denis Zgonjanin
deniszgonjanin at gmail.com
Mon Jul 20 16:03:38 UTC 2015
Yes, I'm not sure whether there is a reason that needs to be there. Perhaps
someone more familiar with harvester could weigh in.
But it would be better if it was just a message instead of a stack trace.
For new users especially, where seeing an error will usually give you the
impression that you didn't set something up properly.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Stefan Oderbolz <stefan.oderbolz at liip.ch>
wrote:
> This is a good point, I'm already used to see this exception, it no longer
> bothers me. But it might be worth catching this exception and simply return
> a nice message indicating what's going on.
> Or is there a good reason for this behavior?
>
> - Stefan
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Denis Zgonjanin <deniszgonjanin at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Knud,
>>
>> This is normal behavior (although one could make an argument that in the
>> case of normal behavior software shouldn't throw an error).
>>
>> Jobs will run on a harvesting schedule, which you define when you create
>> the harvester in the web UI. For example, you create a daily harvester and
>> do 'harvester run'. The job runs, and harvested will compute when the next
>> job is due to be ran (24 hours from now). If you do `harvester run` before
>> then, you will get the expected error above.
>>
>> - Denis
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Knud Hinnerk Möller <
>> knud at datalysator.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a problem setting up ckanext-harvest for production. I’m
>>> following the steps explained in
>>> https://github.com/ckan/ckanext-harvest/blob/master/README.rst#setting-up-the-harvesters-on-a-production-server,
>>> which works great at first. However, after the first time the harvester is
>>> run, I get an error message saying "Exception: There are no new harvesting
>>> jobs” each time the harvester is run again via cron. It seems I have to
>>> first create a new harvesting job via command line or Web UI. Is this
>>> intended behaviour? Or am I missing something? Could someone point me in
>>> the right direction?
>>>
>>> ---------
>>> 2015-07-20 17:00:03,530 DEBUG [ckan.config.environment] Loading the
>>> synchronous search plugin
>>> 2015-07-20 17:00:06,606 DEBUG [ckanext.harvest.model] Harvest tables
>>> defined in memory
>>> 2015-07-20 17:00:06,620 DEBUG [ckanext.harvest.model] Harvest tables
>>> already exist
>>> 2015-07-20 17:00:06,636 DEBUG [ckanext.berlin.plugin] get_actions
>>> 2015-07-20 17:00:06,667 DEBUG [ckanext.harvest.plugin] Using auth
>>> profile at ckanext.harvest.logic.auth
>>> 2015-07-20 17:00:06,699 INFO [ckanext.harvest.logic.action.update]
>>> Harvest job run: {}
>>> 2015-07-20 17:00:06,734 INFO [ckanext.harvest.logic.action.update] No
>>> new harvest jobs.
>>>
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>> File ".../pyenv/bin/paster", line 9, in <module>
>>> load_entry_point('PasteScript==1.7.5', 'console_scripts', 'paster')()
>>> File
>>> ".../pyenv/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paste/script/command.py", line
>>> 104, in run
>>> invoke(command, command_name, options, args[1:])
>>> File
>>> ".../pyenv/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paste/script/command.py", line
>>> 143, in invoke
>>> exit_code = runner.run(args)
>>> File
>>> ".../pyenv/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paste/script/command.py", line
>>> 238, in run
>>> result = self.command()
>>> File
>>> ".../pyenv/src/ckanext-harvest/ckanext/harvest/commands/harvester.py", line
>>> 108, in command
>>> self.run_harvester()
>>> File
>>> ".../pyenv/src/ckanext-harvest/ckanext/harvest/commands/harvester.py", line
>>> 243, in run_harvester
>>> jobs = get_action('harvest_jobs_run')(context,{})
>>> File
>>> ".../pyenv/src/ckanext-harvest/ckanext/harvest/logic/action/update.py",
>>> line 145, in harvest_jobs_run
>>> raise Exception('There are no new harvesting jobs')
>>> Exception: There are no new harvesting jobs
>>> ------------
>>>
>>> I should add that I’m running an old version of the ckanext-harvest
>>> (@0609262731) and an old version of CKAN (1.8.2). I don’t think that’s the
>>> reason, though.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Knud
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr. Knud Hinnerk Möller
>>> Datalysator - Web Data Solutions and Training
>>> knud at datalysator.com
>>> +49 151 46 44 83 25
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ckan-dev mailing list
>>> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ckan-dev mailing list
>> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Liip AG // Limmatstrasse 183 // CH-8005 Zürich
> Tel +41 43 500 39 80 // GnuPG 0x7B588C67 // www.liip.ch
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-dev/attachments/20150720/31846f16/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the ckan-dev
mailing list