[ckan-dev] Looking forward to CKAN 2.4

Fri Mar 13 03:50:18 UTC 2015

+1 for spatial edition

We are working on bringing preview capabilities for both shapefiles
<http://taijiang.tw/en/dataset/taijiang-park-land-use/resource/39154c11-2949-477f-b2a8-8823a3a24b22>
and wmts services
<http://taijiang.tw/en/dataset/wmts/resource/3611e0b9-b8ba-484e-8ebf-344cb111cc08>
.

We plan to submit a pull request to ckanext-spatial, but a CKAN spatial edition
sounds good :)

2015-03-13 11:18 GMT+08:00 Corey Erickson <corey at coasta.ca>:

> +1 for spatial edition
>
> Working on a new deployment using 2.3 right now. that is
> using ckanext-spatial would be a great time to have a spatial edition ;)
>
> -Corey
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Florian May
> <florian.wendelin.mayer at gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 for spatial edition! My end users wanted easier georeferencing.
> >
> > Prototype - https://vimeo.com/116324887
> > Request - https://github.com/ckan/ideas-and-roadmap/issues/138
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Florian
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Ross Jones <ross at servercode.co.uk>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I was wondering if it is too early to talk about CKAN 2.4 yet?  I'm
> still
> >> totally stoked that 2.3 is out (thanks everyone), and I'm really looking
> >> forward to seeing some sites migrate up to it, but I was wondering if
> now
> >> would be a good time to discuss what happens next.
> >>
> >> Currently we have 124 open ideas at
> >> https://github.com/ckan/ideas-and-roadmap/issues (if you didn't know
> about
> >> it, please add more), although without sponsors some of them may never
> >> happen.  I guess the core team will pick ideas that they're interested
> in,
> >> or are required by their sponsor, but as a bigger picture I was hoping
> there
> >> might be some sort of steer from the, um, steering group and user base
> as a
> >> whole as to some sort of priority. This might help other people wanting
> to
> >> contribute* to pick things to work on.
> >>
> >> Perhaps we should pick themes for the releases - so for instance,
> there's
> >> been a lot of interest in more geospatial features - we could make 2.4
> the
> >> geospatial edition?  Just a thought.   Obviously outstanding issues
> need to
> >> be fixed, and people will pick up from the ideas repo as things interest
> >> them, but perhaps a theme, or at least some priorities for the next
> release
> >> would be a good idea.
> >>
> >> Ross.
> >>
> >>
> >> p.s. I've posted this to ckan-dev, and hoping that some of the steering
> >> group may be on the list because I didn't want to cross-post to the
> >> ckan-global-user-group list. Cross-posting is evil and I'd hate to be
> one of
> >> those people who start emails "Sorry for cross-posting".
> >>
> >> * Reminder you don't have to be a dev to contribute, ticket-gardening,
> >> documentation, translations, testing, all very, very, very useful.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ckan-dev mailing list
> >> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> >> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ckan-dev mailing list
> > ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> > https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-dev/attachments/20150313/05ddb2e5/attachment-0003.html>