[ckan-discuss] CKAN branching policy
john.bywater at appropriatesoftware.net
Fri Aug 27 10:15:22 BST 2010
Friedrich Lindenberg wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2010, at 10:35 AM, David Read wrote:
>> One thing though: the 'metastable' branch has a mixture of alphas,
>> betas and full releases on at different times, so better branch name
>> is tricky.
> I also like Tim's suggestion, since I'd been wondering about the term "metastable" for a while. Why not steal from Debian and go with "testing"?
Me too. If this is being reviewed, would it make sense to name the
branch after what one tends to do with it? Perhaps we could use
"experimenting", "developing", "testing", "releasing", and then
"maintaining-1.0", "maintaining-1.1", etc?
More information about the ckan-discuss