[ckan-discuss] CKAN integration with gridworks / refine

Richard Cyganiak richard at cyganiak.de
Sun Nov 28 21:01:28 GMT 2010

On 27 Nov 2010, at 21:41, Tim McNamara wrote:
> There's no requirement for CKAN to store the derived, clean versions  
> of the
> datasets. It makes more sense for CKAN to store the change history  
> (which is
> just a JSON object). This is how Google Refine is designed to work,  
> and
> would reduce the burden that CKAN would need to carry.

But then you can't use the clean version of the dataset if you don't  
have Refine installed.

I think it's better if users can download the clean data directly in  


> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-discuss mailing list
> ckan-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-discuss

More information about the ckan-discuss mailing list