[ckan-discuss] [okfn-help] vdm with pending support

David Read david.read at okfn.org
Fri Oct 22 14:35:43 BST 2010


Martijn,

It's great to hear about the vdm changes to managed objects set to
'pending' state (alongside 'active' and 'deleted'). This will be most
helpful for us too in CKAN going forward.

David

On 22 October 2010 14:00, Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I managed to create some modifications to vdm that include support for
> "pending" data. I'll describe briefly what I've done.
>
> There is one primary use case:
>
> Not all data in the database is considered "published", some data is
> pending. It should be possible to extract a snapshot of the database
> for a particular revision that includes only the published data. It
> should also be possible to use the database and makes changes to it
> that are not published but pending.
>
> I've not implemented the "extract snapshot" functionality itself yet,
> but I believe it's not difficult to implement now. I have focused on
> adding support for creating pending modifications.
>
> First, you need to enable the pending support, by setting it on the session:
>
> session.pending_enabled = True
>
> If you don't do this, vdm will continue to function as before.
>
> If you do enable pending support:
>
> * when you insert a new item to the database, its state will be set to
> PENDING_INSERT automatically.
>
> * when you update an item in the database (and you don't explicitly
> modify its state yourself), its state will be set to PENDING_UPDATE
>
> * you can also manually set the state to PENDING_DELETE
>
> There are a few new methods available on the StatefulObjectMixin, in particular:
>
> * is_pending: check whether an item is pending
>
> * publish: publish a pending item to make it an ACTIVE item
>
> * revert: throw away pending changes for item (that means throwing
> away the item in case of PENDING_INSERT)
>
> * get_nonpending: get the last non-pending historical revision for an
> item (in case of PENDING_UPDATE)
>
> publish and revert are aware of relations. This means, by the way,
> that you need to express as relations those foreign key relations your
> database has, preferably with backrefs in place, otherwise you risk
> creating inconsistent state.
>
> Some of the rules:
>
> if you publish PENDING_INSERT, it will automatically publish any
> MANYTOONE relation that's also PENDING_INSERT.
>
> You can do publish PENDING_INSERT with the cascade argument set to
> True, in which case it will also publish any related items through a
> ONETOMANY relation.
>
> If you publish PENDING_UPDATE, it will simply make it ACTIVE. If you
> set cascade, any related objects through ONETOMANY will also be
> published.
>
> If you publish PENDING_DELETE, it will remove the item. It will also
> remove all items related to it through a ONETOMANY relation. Those
> items *have* to be PENDING_DELETE as well. Again, with cascade set any
> one to many related items will be published.
>
> If you revert a PENDING_INSERT, it will be removed from the database.
> Any related items (through one to many) will also be removed, and they
> all have to be set to PENDING_INSERT.
>
> If you revert a PENDING_UPDATE, the last non-pending version's data
> will be written back to this item. (you might need to re-query the
> objects to see the result, underlying relations might have changed)
>
> If you revert a PENDING_DELETE, the objects will return to ACTIVE state.
>
> Again reversion can be done with 'cascade' set to True in the
> argument, so that all underling one to many objects will also be
> recursively reverted.
>
> And that's about it.
>
> The code is here in bitbucket:
>
> http://bitbucket.org/faassen/vdm-pending/
>
> (this also contains my MySQL modifications, plus the module cleanup)
>
> Regards,
>
> Martijn
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-help mailing list
> okfn-help at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-help
>



More information about the ckan-discuss mailing list