[ckan-discuss] Odd error message from API

Fri Apr 1 11:10:40 BST 2011

The post should contain the old revision id and the result would contain a new one. For detecting edit conflicts. The actual value being opaque to the client of course.

Christopher Gutteridge <cjg at ecs.soton.ac.uk> a écrit :

>I don't understand your description of the fail condition.
>
>Surely a POST will have a *new* revision id?
>
>William Waites wrote:
>> Related to this, what of handling of the revision id? I think
>> (1) it needs to be required (not sure if it is at the moment)
>> and (2) if a POST arrives with a missing revision id or one
>> that doesn't match the current revision the POST should fail.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -w
>>
>>
>> * [2011-04-01 10:51:36 +0200] David Read <david.read at okfn.org> écrit:
>>
>> ] Hi Chris,
>> ] 
>> ] This week, we've changed our API subtly in its handling of 'license'
>> ] and 'license_id' fields. ckan.net is running our beta release at the
>> ] moment, and it's useful to catch these issues before it is released
>> ] elsewhere.
>> ] 
>> ] The reasoning behind it is: now you can simply GET a package, edit it
>> ] and PUSH it. When you GET a package, the 'license' field is the plain
>> ] text name of the license, and 'license_id' is for the short-code.
>> ] Previously you could set either to be the ID and it worked, but to
>> ] avoid confusion you now have to set the 'license_id' field (as per the
>> ] API spec, I'm afraid...). It could be more clever and permissive, but
>> ] I fear that might just serve to confuse even more people.
>> ] 
>> ] And it looks like the error message has a problem - it should point
>> ] you to the 'license' field being the issue. Cheers for the heads up on
>> ] this.
>> ] 
>> ] Anyway, do let us know if changing 'license' to 'license_id' solves it.
>> ] 
>> ] Dave
>> ] 
>> ] On 31 March 2011 19:13, Christopher Gutteridge <cjg at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>> ] >
>> ] > It's saying "Package format incorrect: Key %r is readonly - do not include
>> ] > in the package or leave it unchanged."
>> ] >
>> ] > On this data:
>> ] > http://data.southampton.ac.uk/dataset/places.ckan.json
>> ] >
>> ] > I don't understand!
>> ] >
>> ] > --
>> ] > Christopher Gutteridge -- http://id.ecs.soton.ac.uk/person/1248
>> ] >
>> ] > / Lead Developer, EPrints Project, http://eprints.org/
>> ] > / Web Projects Manager, ECS, University of Southampton,
>> ] > http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/
>> ] > / Webmaster, Web Science Trust, http://www.webscience.org/
>> ] >
>> ] >
>> ] > _______________________________________________
>> ] > ckan-discuss mailing list
>> ] > ckan-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>> ] > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-discuss
>> ] >
>> ] 
>> ] _______________________________________________
>> ] ckan-discuss mailing list
>> ] ckan-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>> ] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-discuss
>>
>>   
>
>-- 
>Christopher Gutteridge -- http://id.ecs.soton.ac.uk/person/1248
>
>You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
>