[ckan-discuss] Topic list (vocabulary/valuelist) for classifying datasets .

Pablo Mendes pablomendes at gmail.com
Wed Jun 20 12:02:17 BST 2012


I would say all or any of the above, depending on who tags it. But like you
said, it is a different discussion.


On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Plantinga, Edo <
Edo.Plantinga at koop.wmrijk.nl> wrote:

> **
> Hi Pablo,
>
> You are right, I was just looking for a gov specific topic list, I should
> have been more specific about that.
> My gut feeling is that finding a limited and meaningful topic list to
> include datasets outside of the gov domain would be neigh on impossible,
> since that would pretty much mean classifying Everything (I imagine that
> there are many datasets that are not newsworthy, but still useful). Other
> than that, the IPTC topic list is often linked to target audiences, which I
> find is difficult in the context of datasets: is a dataset with locations
> of park benches aimed at people that want to walk outdoors (Leisure?), park
> bench maintenance crews and their competition (Business?) or fitness
> enthousiast that want to use them in their excercises (Sports?) or .... Anyway,
> that is a different discussion I suppose. For now I myself will be
> focussing on gov data, which for me is complicated enough.
>
> Regards,
>
> Edo
>
> **** **
>
> ** **
>
> Bezoekt u binnenkort een locatie van de Rijksoverheid?****
>
> ** **
>
> Dan dient u in het bezit te zijn van een geldige Rijkspas of een geldig
> identiteitsbewijs (paspoort, nationale identiteitskaart, rijbewijs of
> vreemdelingendocument). Indien u bij controle geen geldig identiteitsbewijs
> kunt tonen, wordt de toegang geweigerd. Legitimatiebewijzen van andere
> organisaties worden niet geaccepteerd.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u
> niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is
> toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht
> te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van
> welke aard dan ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het
> elektronisch verzenden van berichten.****
>
> ** **
>
> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you
> are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you
> are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State
> accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risk
> inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.****
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-discuss/attachments/20120620/c72007e1/attachment.htm>


More information about the ckan-discuss mailing list