[ckan-discuss] [ckan-dev] questions on resources import / export

[Elena Camossi]

Dear Adrià,

thanks for your comment, you and Emanuele are absolutely right. 
We're continuing the discussion together with Emanuele and the GeoNetwork
team directly, to give them a more clear feedback and  to understand if the
issues our institution is experiencing  are due by our lack of experience in
using and configuring GN according to the requirements of our projects or if
we're actually working on a more complex scenario with respect to the one GN
has been tested so far. And, of course, to define the possible solutions :)
In the next weeks we're going to test also the integration of GN and CKAN,
so we will be able to provide some feedback to CKAN lists  as well.

Cheers,
-Elena 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrià Mercader [mailto:adria.mercader at okfn.org]
> Sent: mercoledì 23 ottobre 2013 18:24
> To: CKAN Development Discussions; CKAN discuss
> Cc: Elena Camossi
> Subject: Re: [ckan-dev] questions on resources import / export
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I agree with Emanuele, CKAN and GeoNetwork, although sharing some
> functionality, are different tools with different audiences.
> A good project will choose the right tool or integrate different tools to
> provide the best solution to its use case.
> 
> On 21 October 2013 10:26, Emanuele Tajariol <etj at geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> >> GN was also among the candidates for the geographical metadata, but
> >> some partners reported some issues so we're actually discarding it.
> >
> > What's great about open source products is the fact you have
> > communities to discuss (and solve problems) with ;)
> Big +1. Any feedback that you can report to the project will be useful,
even
> negative.
> 
> 
> Adrià
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >    Cheers,
> >    Emanuele
> >
> >
> > PS: I guess this thread would fit better in ckan-discuss that -dev.
> >
> >
> > Alle 10:16:47 di Monday 21 October 2013, Elena Camossi ha scritto:
> >> Dear Emanuele,
> >>
> >> thanks a lot for your opinion, very much appreciated.
> >> We're defining the architecture of our system that will encompass CSW
> >> and non CSW harvesting from several geographical sources, and from
> >> non-geographical catalogues  as well. Our Idea is to test both CKAN
> >> and DKAN and their geographical extensions for our catalogue, but we
> >> are also interested to understand the possible interactions among the
> two solutions.
> >> GN was also among the candidates for the geographical metadata, but
> >> some partners reported some issues so we're actually discarding it.
> >>
> >> What was you're experience with using GN? Did you have the
> >> opportunity to compare it with CKAN and it's geographical extension for
> example?
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> -Elena
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Emanuele Tajariol [mailto:etj.mlist at gmail.com]
> >> > Sent: mercoledì 16 ottobre 2013 18:02
> >> > To: Elena Camossi
> >> > Cc: ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [ckan-dev] questions on resources import / export
> >> >
> >> > Hi Elena,
> >> >
> >> > in a couple of deploy we did, we used CKAN and GeoNetwork in the
> >> > same node.
> >> > CKAN is used as user frontend, and publishes both geo and non-geo
> >> > datasets.
> >> > GeoNetwork is used for CSW access.
> >> > CKAN harvests the geographic metadata from GN using CSW, while the
> >> > non- geo dataset are edited directly on CKAN. Geographic metadata
> >> > are of course edited on GeoNetwork.
> >> >
> >> > If you have different catalogues that should interact, it's usually
> >> > a good
> >>
> >> idea
> >>
> >> > to use existing standards (CSW for geographic datasets, for
instance).
> >> > Using internal formats (such as querying Solr) may be more
> >> > efficient, but then you would be tied to a specific version of the
> >> > application and its
> >>
> >> internal
> >>
> >> > model; some more work would be needed every time internal formats
> >> > change.
> >> > Just my 2¢ :)
> >> >
> >> >    Cheers,
> >> >    Emanuele
> >> >
> >> > Alle 16:03:03 di Tuesday 15 October 2013, Elena Camossi ha scritto:
> >> > > Dear all,
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm a newbie to CKAN and I'm trying to understand how to define a
> >> > > possible architecture for a platform for data sharing we're going
> >> > > to
> >>
> >> develop.
> >>
> >> > > Both geographical and traditional (non-geographical) resources
> >> > > will be included, and these will be harvested from different
providers.
> >> > >
> >> > > For what concern the consumption of resources by other internal
> >> > > catalogue platforms (different from CKAN, e.g., DKAN,
> >> > > GeoNetwork), what can be the most EFFICIENT solution?
> >> > > Exposing CKAN (for non-geographical) and CSW (for geographical
> >> > > resource) services and let these other catalogues harvest the
> >> > > resources
> >> >
> >> > from CKAN?
> >> >
> >> > > Is it possible to make another catalogue interact with the CKAN
> >> > > instance directly at Solr level, avoiding the catalogue services?
> >> > > Or is it necessary to pass through the Datastore API?
> >> > >
> >> > > I hope this is not too confusing...
> >> > > Thanks a lot for any suggestion.
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > -Elena
> >> >
> >> > --
> >
> >
> > --
> > ==
> > Our support, Your Success!
> > Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information.
> > ==
> >
> > Ing. Emanuele Tajariol
> > Technical Lead
> >
> > GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> > Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> > 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> > Italy
> > phone: +39 0584 962313
> > fax:    +39 0584 1660272
> > mob:   +39 380 2116282
> >
> > http://www.geo-solutions.it
> > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ckan-dev mailing list
> > ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev