[ckan-discuss] [ckan-dev] Blog post on using CKAN for research data

[Irina Bolychevsky]

Thank you Ian, Hendrik,

I've added some quick notes to our roadmap here:
https://trello.com/c/VinbHQia/115-better-metadata-schema-support - please
feel free to comment or suggest edits. I think we also want to add support
to get popular schema's "off the shelf" so to speak. Will add this to the
agenda for the next product dev meeting. Do you have time to work on this
now/soon?  - I think we'd be happy to help comment / contribute to a spec.

Best,
Irina

**

*Irina Bolychevsky*

*Government Open Data & CKAN Manager  |  skype: flouxi  |  twitter:
@shevski<http://twitter.com/shevski>
*

*The Open Knowledge Foundation <http://okfn.org/>*

*Empowering through Open Knowledge*

*http://okfn.org/  |  @okfn <http://twitter.com/OKFN>  |  OKF on
Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> |
Blog <http://blog.okfn.org/>  |  Newsletter<http://okfn.org/about/newsletter>
*
*
CKAN | http://ckan.org | @ckanproject <http://twitter.com/ckanproject>
|open source data management platform
*



On 5 September 2013 09:46, Hendrik Bunke <h.bunke at zbw.eu> wrote:

> Hi Irina,
>
> On 4 September 2013 14:56, Irina Bolychevsky <irina.bolychevsky at okfn.org>
>  wrote:
>
>>
>> This is a great post. Really detailed, interesting and a good intro to
>> working with CKAN. Would you be interested in us reposting it on the CKAN
>> blog?
>>
>
> I'm glad you like the post, and EDaWaX (and me) would be honored if you
> repost it in the CKAN blog. We'd just like you to put our logo (
> http://134.245.93.76/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/edawax_logo.png)
> somewhere. Would that be OK?
>
>
>> I would also be interested to know how we can improve the metadata schema
>> support. Maybe something that can be added to the roadmap<https://trello.com/board/roadmap/50b4ef4201d86a1603002077>?
>> Or we can help you in developing.
>>
>
> Regarding metadata Ian already gave an important hint. We'd need some
> abstraction level or framework in CKAN that simplifies the implementation
> of custom metadata schemes. At the moment there are too many points an
> extensions has to hook in (templates, forms, validation...). That would
> also be a good foundation for a more longterm project (or perhaps dream
> ;-): all available metadata schemas (DDI; DataCite, da|ra, whatever) are
> published in XML (as XML Schema usually). I'd like to derive CKAN metadata
> fields directly from those schemas. At the moment I don't have the time to
> do that, but I will certainly try within in the next six month to start
> that exemplary for the da|ra schema. And, of course, it would be great to
> have more dev support for this.
>
> best regards
> hendrik
>
> --
> Dr. Hendrik Bunke
> ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften
> Innovative Informations- und Publikationstechnologien (IIPT)
> Tel.: +49 40 42834 454 (Hamburg) OR +49 421 7940430 (homeoffice)
> http://zbw.eu
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-discuss/attachments/20130910/ec7a9930/attachment-0001.htm>