[ECODP-dev] Import SG package problem

Wed Aug 21 10:33:13 UTC 2013

Hello John,
"Confirm", means update the git master repository, then deploy ? or test 
only against test-server?

Thanks
Dimitrios

On 21/08/2013 10:57, John Glover wrote:
> Hi Dimitrios,
>
> Following up on this issue, I believe that it should now be fixed in 
> the latest ckanext-ecportal which is deployed on the test server. 
> Could you please confirm when you get the chance?
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>
> On 26 July 2013 12:51, Dimitrios Mexis <dimitrios.mexis at tenforce.com 
> <mailto:dimitrios.mexis at tenforce.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi David/John,
>
>     we have a strange case. An SG package, that is not uploaded to the
>     customer, but on our side it is uploaded on 8.
>
>     The file of the output of process, shows something as immediate
>     stop of communication. With no apparent reason.
>
>     Attachments & Description:
>     I attach you the rdf file.  Which is the same file, as in a
>     previous message I had posted, and that gives problems to the
>     customer as well.
>     the error log of the ecodp, which signifies some possible problem
>     with SOLR.
>     The TENFORCE version 8 is the file generated from ourside trying
>     to upload on 8 release, and it worked.
>     Release 9, is interrupted messages I got from the latest version.
>
>     Remarks: it seems at this installation of customer, tomcat6 and
>     solr for version 8 to be...unstable. I don't follow why. As if it
>     might stop on its own. So : if SOLR is down is the import failing
>     too ?
>     On 9, I notice strange behavior, that sometimes didn't want to
>     import the package. Is the rdf valid one for upload ?
>     I notice that even if I escape characters in bash and using curl I
>     might have errors like No JSON Output on release 9, and that gives
>     me internal server errors.
>
>     also, I noticed that it failed to me, once when it was trying to
>     import the data, when I had marked it as deleted. That happened
>     once. At least that is what I understood. I didn't expect it so I
>     can not tell for sure if that is problem.
>
>     They don't claim to have problems with other packages.
>
>     Is it possible to take a look also ?
>
>     Thank you
>     Dimitrios
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/private/ecodp-dev/attachments/20130821/ff57edc0/attachment.html>