[ECODP-dev] Fwd: FW: [ODP] 09.00 Installation update - general status - comments

Tue Jul 9 09:56:03 UTC 2013

That's great. How quick is the import when you run it on this server?

Best,

Darwin

On Tuesday, July 9, 2013, Dimitrios Mexis wrote:

> on 212 machine, rdf2ckan is installed. On  /root there is the ESTAT zip
> package for making copies.
> You can copy it anytime to the
> /applications/ecodp/users/ecodp/rdf2ckan/work/import folder. before you run
> the software
>
> Go to /applications/ecodp/users/ecodp/rdf2ckan/bin
> and issue the command ./rdf2ckan.sh -c
>
> this flag is one of the options you can have from the utility, and will
> validate and try to import the ESTAT zip package.
>
> Currently we have already started the software running.
> In the logs you can see relevant output.
>
> _WORKFLOW_ is the more detailed
> _BUSINESSFLOW_ is little less output than previous
>
> Regards
> Dimitrios
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Bert Van Nuffelen <
> bert.van.nuffelen at tenforce.com> wrote:
>
> We will do this.
>
> Bert
>
>
> 2013/7/9 Darwin Peltan <darwin.peltan at okfn.org>
>
> Hi Bert,
>
> It would be very helpful if you could try the import on the 212.x server
> please and see if the issue is the same there. If so we can quickly rule
> out the possibility that it's a config issue and look at other causes.
>
> Would that be OK please?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Darwin
>
> On Tuesday, July 9, 2013, Bert Van Nuffelen wrote:
>
> Hi Darwin,
>
> this is indeed on the case on odp.tenforce.com too. We did our tests
> yesterday with the information provided by PO and we obtain similar
> performance results.
> On the test machine, I do not know what John did. So no statement from my
> side if that is representable.
>
> Note that this will block probably the acceptance of release 00.09.00 and
> might lead to a rejection of the release.
>
> best regards,
>
> Bert
>
>
>
>
> 2013/7/9 Darwin Peltan <darwin.peltan at okfn.org>
>
> Hi Bert,
>
> I am very surprised by this as we obviously  wouldn't expect this. We will
> do some initial investigations this week and come back to you. However as
> discussed we have limited availability this week so if we're not able to
> diagnose the issue we'll need to continue investigating next week.
>
> Is the performance the same on our test server (212.x) as ODP.tenforce.con?
>
> Best,
>
> Darwin
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 9, 2013, Bert Van Nuffelen wrote:
>
> Hi Darwin, John and David,
>
> Can you have a look to the performance. Currentltly release 00.09.00 is 80
> times slower on ingest (from 250ms to 20s).
> That is a serious regression. Would it be possible to give a short status
> for this afternoon (call with PO at 1400h Brussels time) on the
> investigation and what is the action plan to get further improvements.
>
> best regards,
>
> Bert
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *ZAJAC Agnieszka (OP)* <Agnieszka.ZAJAC at publications.europa.eu>
> Date: 2013/7/8
> Subject: FW: [ODP] 09.00 Installation update - general status - comments
> To: "Bert.Van.Nuffelen at tenforce.com" <Bert.Van.Nuffelen at tenforce.com>
> Cc: "MEYER André (OP-EXT)" <Andre.MEYER at ext.publications.europa.eu>,
> "SABETE Vafa (OP)" <Vafa.SABETE at publications.europa.eu>, "ISOARD Olivier
> (OP)" <Olivier.ISOARD at publications.europa.eu>, "HOHN Norbert (OP)" <
> Norbert.HOHN at publications.europa.eu>
>
>
>  Hello Bert,****
>
>

-- 

*Darwin Peltan*

*Project Manager  |  skype: darwinp  |  twitter:
@darwin<http://twitter.com/darwin>
*

*The Open Knowledge Foundation <http://okfn.org/>*

*Empowering through Open Knowledge*

*http://okfn.org/  |  @okfn <http://twitter.com/OKFN>  |  OKF on
Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> |
Blog <http://blog.okfn.org/>  |  Newsletter<http://okfn.org/about/newsletter>
*
*
CKAN | http://ckan.org | @ckanproject <http://twitter.com/ckanproject>
|open source data management platform
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/private/ecodp-dev/attachments/20130709/014016d6/attachment.html>