[epsi-coord] Rotterdam is ok! Fwd: ePSI platform conference - revised and updated program

[Daniel Dietrich]

Great news, now we can start proper planning and promoting...

Lets talk on monday. Nice WE!

Daniel


On 09.12.2011, at 16:37, Marc de Vries wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> This is good news.
> 
> Ton, i agee with your actions. Just one important point: i noticed that Rotterdam became much more eager to sponsor when i said that The Hague was also still an option. So could we communicatie that it will be the NL and 16/3, and that the venue will be decided upon and communicated shortly.
> 
> This implies that we need to get commitments from BZK and or ELI and Rotterdam in the coming weeks.
> 
> I am back from holidays Monday, so we can discuss this in detail.
> 
> Regards, from the Pyrenees, Marc
> 
> 
> 
> Op 9 dec. 2011 om 15:30 heeft Ton Zijlstra <ton.zijlstra at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> 
>> EC ok'd Rotterdam and 16 March for the conference!
>> 
>> See a few additional remarks below, for us to tackle next week.
>> 
>> I would like to start communicating the conference next week as well.
>> With only three months to go, we need to get moving on external communications.
>> 
>> I intend to send out an e-mail to our mailing list for a) PSI Directive review, b) our topic reports c) the conference on Tuesday morning.
>> 
>> best,
>> 
>> Ton
>> -------------------------------------------
>> Interdependent Thoughts
>> Ton Zijlstra
>> 
>> ton at tonzijlstra.eu
>> +31-6-34489360
>> 
>> http://zylstra.org/blog
>> -------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: <Juan.PELEGRIN at ec.europa.eu>
>> Date: Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:12 PM
>> Subject: RE: ePSI platform conference - revised and updated program
>> To: info at devriesmarc.nl
>> Cc: ton.zijlstra at gmail.com, Gudrun.Stock at ec.europa.eu, Malte.BEYER-KATZENBERGER at ec.europa.eu, Richard.Swetenham at ec.europa.eu
>> 
>> 
>> Dear Marc,
>>  
>> thanks for your revised proposal and clarifications.
>>  
>> You can go-ahead with the 16th March date in Rotterdam, but look forward to seeing a strong non Dutch presence list in the meeting.
>>  
>> As per the content of the programme we would still need a slot to a) present the revised Commission Directive proposal followed by a panel to discuss the proposed changes, and b) within the mini session we would like that the topic of re-use of cultural content (Europeana) is also discussed.Please provide us with a revised programme shortly
>>  
>> As per the programme itself we still have some difficulties as to how the mini session/carrousel will be organised, maybe it would be worthwhile clarifying it in the programme, and allocating appropriate time/logistics so that attendants can move  from one room to another.
>>  
>> Thanks
>>  
>>  
>> Juan
>> 
>> From: Marc de Vries [mailto:info at devriesmarc.nl] 
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 10:56 AM
>> To: PELEGRIN Juan (INFSO)
>> Cc: ton.zijlstra at gmail.com; STOCK Gudrun (INFSO); BEYER-KATZENBERGER Malte (INFSO); juanpelegrinmccarthy at yahoo.es
>> Subject: ePSI platform conference - revised and updated program
>> 
>> Dear Juan,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I am happy to send you the revised proposal for the ePSI Conference, te be held on 16 March 2012.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> In conformity with your request, we:
>> 
>> 1.       Put more focus to the overriding theme and aims of the Conference.
>> 
>> 2.       Made the program and setting as concrete as possible (in this stage) adding names and topics and inserting a detailed program. As you will see, we trimmed it and dropped some of the ‘wilder’ ideas (like the ‘PSI Parliament’ and the ‘Ask an Expert’), but maintained and fortified the networking parts of the Conference, putting more thoughts and substance into ‘what to take away from the Conference’.
>> 
>> 3.       Reserved 30 minutes in the plenary allowing you (or your colleagues) to announce the launch of the Thematic Network on PSI standards (also allowing participants to start discussing this during the networking part of the Conference and discuss and plan for submission of a bid)
>> 
>> 4.       Substantiated the sound basis and logic of holding the Conference in Rotterdam (also taking into account the logistical requirements connected to the form of the Conference and transport aspects – you can get from Schiphol Airport to Rotterdam Airport in 26 minutes)
>> 
>> 5.       Made an assessment of the ‘foreign’ (non Dutch) participants anticipated to attend the Conference (over one hundred people).
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> We would very much appreciate your response to our suggestions so that we can continue and intensify our efforts to organize the event, also allowing us to take further concrete actions on venue and logistics.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> On behalf of the ePSI team,
>> 
>> Marc de Vries
>> 
>> +31 653897002
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Van: Juan.PELEGRIN at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Juan.PELEGRIN at ec.europa.eu] 
>> Verzonden: dinsdag 29 november 2011 15:43
>> Aan: info at devriesmarc.nl
>> CC: ton.zijlstra at gmail.com; Gudrun.Stock at ec.europa.eu; Malte.BEYER-KATZENBERGER at ec.europa.eu; juanpelegrinmccarthy at yahoo.es
>> Onderwerp: RE: Epsipltform conference
>> Urgentie: Hoog
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Marc,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> could you please also send a copy of your revised proposal for the Conference to those in copy thanks.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> We need urgently and update as agreed last week over the phone.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Juan
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Ton Zijlstra [mailto:ton.zijlstra at gmail.com] 
>> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 5:16 PM
>> To: PELEGRIN Juan (INFSO)
>> Cc: Marc de Vries
>> Subject: Re: Epsipltform conference
>> 
>> Yes, Marc is available. His email address is different from the one you used. I will not be available tomorrow, as mentioned friday.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Ton
>> 
>> Op 21 nov. 2011 16:21 schreef <Juan.PELEGRIN at ec.europa.eu> het volgende:
>> 
>> Ton, Mark,
>> 
>> Can we discuss tomorrow the Conference ?
>> 
>> Juan
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> epsi-coord mailing list
>> epsi-coord at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/epsi-coord
> _______________________________________________
> epsi-coord mailing list
> epsi-coord at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/epsi-coord