[epsi-coord] Belgian case description

Ton Zijlstra ton.zijlstra at gmail.com
Sun Nov 6 19:33:02 GMT 2011


Thanks, I will publish them tomorrow morning.
-------------------------------------------
Interdependent Thoughts
Ton Zijlstra

ton at tonzijlstra.eu
+31-6-34489360

http://zylstra.org/blog
-------------------------------------------


On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Hans Graux <hans.graux at timelex.eu> wrote:

> Hi Ton and Marc,
>
>
>
> I have sent the descriptions to a colleague of mine for review, and he
> made a few editorial improvements and corrected a few errors. The versions
> in attachment should be suitable for publication now.
>
>
>
> The abuse of dominance angle is very interesting. Since the CBE
> commercially exploits the data as well, it could be seen as a competitor to
> Infobase. However, I’m not sure if the claim would be upheld, mainly for
> two reasons. Firstly, I think the CBE could claim that they’re not playing
> in the same market. The CBE sells raw data to third parties, whereas
> Infobase analysis this data, enriches it, and then sells the result onward.
> CBE might credible claim that they’re more of a supplier than a competitor,
> which would undermine the legal argument, or at least Infobase’s standing.
> Secondly, the CBE could claim that they’re not dominant in the market,
> because there are other data suppliers: Infobase itself, but also Graydon
> and Dun & Bradstreet (who are in fact both mentioned by name in the
> decision, in relation to an unproven claim by Infobase that they might be
> using the CBE without these restrictions). All of these have other
> information sources than the CBE, so the CBE’s position of market dominance
> is not so clear cut.
>
>
> I’m not sure how the argument would turn out. The court didn’t mention it
> in its ruling, so it’s probably best not to speculate on it here. Might be
> an interesting topic for a future TR, though.
>
>
>
> Hans
>
>
>
> P.S. I may miss part of the call tomorrow, due to a workshop with an
> uncertain end time. I’ll do my best to be there on time, though.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Van:* epsi-coord-bounces at lists.okfn.org [mailto:
> epsi-coord-bounces at lists.okfn.org] *Namens *Marc de Vries
> *Verzonden:* zondag 6 november 2011 17:17
> *Aan:* epsi-coord at lists.okfn.org
> *CC:* epsi-coord at lists.okfn.org
> *Onderwerp:* Re: [epsi-coord] Belgian case description
>
>
>
> Hans, Ton,
>
>
>
> I had à look at the case and i find it very interesting and well
> summarized. Hans, the licencing condition to report changes or mistakes
> could that pne even be considered abuse of dominance? Just à thought...
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Marc
>
>
> Op 6 nov. 2011 om 14:23 heeft Ton Zijlstra <ton.zijlstra at gmail.com> het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hans,
>
>
>
> have these been proof-read already, by Patricia or otherwise?
>
> Are they ready to publish?
>
>
>
> best,
>
> Ton
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Interdependent Thoughts
> Ton Zijlstra
>
> ton at tonzijlstra.eu
> +31-6-34489360
>
> http://zylstra.org/blog
> -------------------------------------------
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Hans Graux <hans.graux at timelex.eu> wrote:
>
> Following on my earlier mail, in attachment you’ll find a report for the
> Ryanair decision. Again, a fairly complicated one, so I hope it is
> sufficiently clear.  I also included an update of the Belgian report, which
> contained a typo (wrong decision date).
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>
>
> *Van:* Hans Graux [mailto:hans.graux at timelex.eu]
> *Verzonden:* woensdag 2 november 2011 13:19
> *Aan:* epsi-coord at lists.okfn.org
> *Onderwerp:* Belgian case description
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> In attachment you’ll find a description for the Belgian case I mentioned
> during Monday’s call. It’s a fairly interesting one (well, to a lawyer
> anyway…), but it might be a bit complex with a fair amount of legal
> terminology. Your impressions and any suggestions for improvements are as
> always welcome.
>
>
>
> I’ll try to submit a second case description for the Ryanair v. Commission
> case this afternoon.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Hans
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> epsi-coord mailing list
> epsi-coord at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/epsi-coord
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> epsi-coord mailing list
> epsi-coord at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/epsi-coord
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> epsi-coord mailing list
> epsi-coord at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/epsi-coord
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/private/epsi-coord/attachments/20111106/31eb4ee0/attachment.htm>


More information about the epsi-coord mailing list