[euopendata] Fwd: Study says charge for public data...

[Paola Di Maio]

Hjalmar

thanks for reply -

One of my concerns is that a lot of public funding is poured into private
sector
as 'research funding', for which the taxpayers who generated the funding
initially never get to see the benefits of (except for the few entrepreneurs
and employees who work for them)


re argument 1
agree that startups may need incentives, and would not have a problem
negotiating favourable conditions with enterprise networks for startups,,
provided any private entreprise reaching break even point  will be treated
as any other private enterprise

re. argument 2 - I dont think so

Successful commercial enterprises are beneficial to the economy as

a whole (and thereby the government) as they pay salaries, taxes, and

buy goods and services from other companies that do the same.


No, successful commercial enterprises are beneficial to those individuals
who
agree to be part of an economic system which is exploitative, wasteful and
neither fair nor sustainable in nature. The economic system as it is (at
national, international and global level) is absurd, it has been absurd
throughout modern history [1]. But until now, it has been difficult to
change.

Those who try to change the economy by distributing resources more evenly,
get nowhere, because entire societies and economies are based on the
concentration of wealth and political hegemony of a few are not letting it
happen (by manipulating knowledge through the media, or fostering
'exclusion', forcing 'scarcity' etc etc )

 By contrast, more distributed economic systems capable of allocating more
evenly political and economic powers more inclusively (irrespective of
people's beliefs and political views for example) are consistently
dismissed.  through the active manipulation of financing and of the
mechanism to introduce innovation  (sorry, rant!). Investors tend to  'bet'
money where they have higher profits, do not care what happens to the planet
and the rest of the world.

I am firmly convinced that the open data movement should work to contrast
the vices of a destructive economic and political system, and still continue
to encourage small enterprise proliferation and innovation etc

PDM

[1]
The Growth Illusion: How Economic Growth Has Enriched the Few, Impoverished
the Many and Endangered the Planet  Richard
Douthwaite<http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=ntt_athr_dp_sr_1?_encoding=UTF8&search-alias=books-uk&field-author=Richard%20Douthwaite>


5.0 out of 5 stars
<http://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/1870098765/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_img?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1>
 Se<http://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/1870098765/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_img?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1>
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Hjalmar Gislason <hjalli at datamarket.com>wrote:

> > Aha, that explains much of the open data sudden frenzy from people who
> have
> > never been interested in public administration, sniffing money are we?
>
> Hehe, no worries: Yes, I'm trying to build a start-up company that
> among other things utilizes public data that is openly available, but
> that came out of my interest for open data, not the other way around
> :)
>
> You might find this blog post interesting:
> -
> http://blog.datamarket.com/2010/06/01/the-commercial-opportunities-in-open-data/
>
> > Open data advocates come in different flavours. Not every Open data
> advocate
> > is keen to foster private enterprise flourish on the back of tax payers
> > money
> >  If the data is used for commercial purposes (ie, to generate revenues) I
> > dont see why private commercial firms benefiting for their own profits
> (to
> > which I do not object) should not contribute to the government effort
> > (spending) for publishing the data in the first place.
> > Otherwise there is increasing public cost (effort) to open the data,
> putting
> > increased strain on resources
> > Effectively this would mean taxpayers money is used to provide commercial
> > opportunities for those who have the marketing and financial networks to
> > generate revenues,
> > It goes without saying that I agree non commercial use should be free.
>
> I agree with you to a certain degree. But I do have two counter arguments:
>
> 1. The fact of the matter is that most of the untapped value in
> opening data lies in unforseeable innovation, i.e. innovation that
> will result from a long line of trial and (mostly) errors, until
> somebody comes up with something that turns out to be valuable and is
> able to extract value from that. This innovation can come from the
> academia, from small startups or large corporations, but the fact of
> the matter is that none of these will be playing around with the data
> if it is not freely available for such tinkering. Even big companies
> only spend money on things they believe are highly likely to be
> successful. A minimal fee can therefore prevent enormous creation of
> value.
>
> 2. Successful commercial enterprises are beneficial to the economy as
> a whole (and thereby the government) as they pay salaries, taxes, and
> buy goods and services from other companies that do the same.
>
> What happened at statistical offices in Scandinavia in the late '90s
> is a great example of this: They used to charge for access to their
> data, first in print and later also in electronic format. With the
> advance of the internet they came to the conclusion that their
> services were worth more to society if access was provided for free
> over the Internet as the marginal cost was close to zero. This has
> really paid off with more usage and better data behind decisions in
> all ranks of society. Nobody today would seriously argue that this
> access should be put behind a paywall again even not by evil people
> that might use it for - gasp - "commercial purposes" :)
>
> It can be really tricky to track the money all the way down in these
> equations, but in my mind the generic rule is really simple: Public
> data should be Open unless other - more important - factors such as
> privacy or security indicate otherwise.
>
> Best,
> -hjalmar
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/euopendata/attachments/20110113/2c3c89d7/attachment-0001.html>