No subject

Sun Dec 12 18:29:16 UTC 2010

are receiving on =A3235,000, with $250,000 going to the Tides Center.
What's happened?
>
>> > happy for OKF to sign this, subject to satisfactory explanation of
>> > browser plugin issue James has raised.
>>
>> The terms "browser plugin" and "embeddable widgets" result from a few
>> rounds of redrafting. I've spoken to and written to Knight to get them t=
o
>> include a reference to this in the side letter, acknowledging how the
>> terms should fit together.
>
> Ok. I sought clarification from Knight about the paperwork and amiguities=
.
>
> They've sent a side letter permitting the use of our preferred licence an=
d
> interpretation of the terminology above; I've attached this.
>
> I've also attached the two documents we need to sign[*]. =A0One is the
> proposed contract with the fiscal sponsor (called "Tides Center"). The
> other is the grant agreement between Knight and the fiscal sponsor, which
> they'd like us to sign in acknowledgement, despite not being a party to
> it. The former passes on to us various obligations imposed by the latter.
>
> Please have another look at these documents

I do not see an "enclosed budget" as specified in p4 of 26154916.pdf
"Basic Grant Conditions" point 3 "Changes to any specific line item in
the enclosed budget greater than 5% should be approved in writing by
Knight Foundation prior to making the change."

Cheers

Becky
>
> Mk
>
> [*] They both incorporate the document I circulated earlier, which I had
> taken to be one of the items needing a signature, as I was confused by th=
e
> terminology.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-board mailing list
> foundation-board at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-board
>