[foundation-board] Knight grant contract

Fri Feb 3 11:29:27 UTC 2012

Thank you.

This confirms that with 4 approvals from the board we have a majority, and
can move ahead with the Knight funding.  Martin, please proceed with the
contract. I will look into getting the invoice out.

Best regards,

Laura

-- 

Dr Laura James
Foundation Coordinator, Open Knowledge Foundation

http://okfn.org

On 2 February 2012 17:31, Ben Laurie <ben at links.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Laura James <laura.james at okfn.org> wrote:
> >
> > I have seen approvals from Martin, Becky, and Rufus. We need a minimum
> of 4
> > out of the 7 on the board for a resolution.
> >
> > Could any of the others approve this resolution to accept the contract,
> or
> > please let me know any outstanding concerns so I can address them asap.
>
> I thought I already did approve it...
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Laura
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 23 January 2012 15:48, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think it is fine. I think is disappointing they are taking 15k for
> >> from our grant but I think we have agreed to live with that.
> >>
> >> Rufus
> >>
> >> On 22 January 2012 10:54, Laura James <laura.james at okfn.org> wrote:
> >> > All,
> >> >
> >> > Is there any other support for Martin's proposed Knight budget?  It
> >> > would be
> >> > good to get this to a resolution and close it out.
> >> >
> >> > If others feel unable to support the budget, can you share your
> >> > concerns?
> >> >
> >> > Best regards,
> >> >
> >> > Laura
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Dr Laura James
> >> > Foundation Coordinator, Open Knowledge Foundation
> >> >
> >> > http://okfn.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 11 January 2012 17:37, Martin Keegan <martin at no.ucant.org> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Becky Hogge wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Getting in a line item for overheads at this late stage is a good
> >> >> > result - thanks, Martin.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The only comment I have is that note 4) on the budget seems
> >> >> > erroneous/misleading, as the budget does detail the project fee.
> But
> >> >> > this is not a deal breaker.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If you're seeking Board approval to progress with this budget, you
> >> >> > have
> >> >> > my +1.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks - do we have any others?
> >> >>
> >> >> Mk
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> foundation-board mailing list
> >> >> foundation-board at lists.okfn.org
> >> >> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-board
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > foundation-board mailing list
> >> > foundation-board at lists.okfn.org
> >> > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-board
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Co-Founder, Open Knowledge Foundation
> >> Promoting Open Knowledge in a Digital Age
> >> http://www.okfn.org/ - http://blog.okfn.org/
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> foundation-board mailing list
> >> foundation-board at lists.okfn.org
> >> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-board
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-board mailing list
> > foundation-board at lists.okfn.org
> > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-board
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-board mailing list
> foundation-board at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-board
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/private/foundation-board/attachments/20120203/9d335f24/attachment.html>