[foundation-board] Openness and licences...

Tue Jan 3 19:14:41 UTC 2012

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:10 PM, James Casbon <casbon at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3 January 2012 12:00, Ben Laurie <ben at links.org> wrote:
>> So, this is my core concern: if we believe in "open", why are we using
>> a licence that fails the test?
>>
>> I would like to separate that question from the question of which
>> licence we should be using: first we should agree that GPL does not
>> meet our standards.
>
> Thanks, Ben.
>
> I agree that GPL does not meet our standards.
>
> PS Also worth noting many of the OKFN's projects on github have no
> license, which should definitely not be the case.

Agreed - is there a definitive list?