[geo-discuss] Texts adopted by Parliament: INSPIRE
saul at theps.net
Sun Jun 18 23:18:25 UTC 2006
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 03:12:28PM -0700, Jo Walsh wrote:
> See in particular http://tinyurl.com/oh38d , "to ask what plans OS has
> for making public data available to the public". The written answer he
> received is basically untrue; OS *does* receive a sizeable state
> subsidy voted by Parliament through NIMSA. Otherwise, this is more
> "our hands our tied by our political masters" material.
Well found Jo.
How immensely frustrating. Is this 'basically' untrue, or 'actually'
>From what we know,
"does not receive any funds voted directly by Parliament"
Sounds wrong, but I suspect it's true that the budget is not voted on in
parliament, which sounds like a very unusual microbudgetary practice
I know how precise the wording used by parliamentarians can be, and how
infuriating a brush-off like this is..
Does anyone know what kinds of things *do* recieve 'funds voted directly
by Parliament'. Difficult territory :/
More information about the geo-discuss