[iRail] iRail API - Actionscript 3 wrapper
Pieter Colpaert
pieter.colpaert at gmail.com
Sat Aug 7 13:58:49 UTC 2010
Where did you read about the results parameter? It's not in the API
specification anymore.
It's not yet implemented. Might implement it soon though.
Pieter
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 15:39 +0200, Joris Timmerman wrote:
> Could it be that the results parameter (to indicate the number of
> results returned) doesn't work?
> Just checked the PHP code
> in http://github.com/Tuinslak/iRail/blob/master/api/trains.php, I see
> that the variable is stored in $results but never used again.
>
> 2010/8/7 Joris Timmerman <joris.timmerman at gmail.com>
> Hi,
>
>
> Implemented the last 2 features in the wrapper.
> Let me know where I can commit them to.
> I made an account on Github yesterday, username: joridor .
>
>
> 2010/8/7 Pieter Colpaert <pieter.colpaert at gmail.com>
>
>
> Ok. Fixed and implemented.
>
> I've added an option to the API &trainsonly
> if 1, it will only return trains, if 0 it will also
> return buses and
> such. Default is 0.
>
> Wiki page: http://wiki.github.com/Tuinslak/iRail/api
> Commit:
> http://github.com/Tuinslak/iRail/commit/cde5e533c4ab22b91e34f2852d2809b26d2899fc
>
> The commit will be pushed to api.irail.be on Monday
> It will be pushed to dev.irail.be/api tonight (I
> think)
>
> Thanks Christophe for your investigation on the
> product values. (It
> helped ;-) )
>
> Pieter
>
>
> On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 12:21 +0200, Joris Timmerman
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > So long as the API gets updated, I'm willing to keep
> this wrapper up to date.
> > I agree with Yeri, I don't have a subscription for
> busses and the fact I hate busses, I always set the
> option on the nmbs website for trains only.
> >
> >
> > Met vriendelijke groet,
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Joris Timmerman
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > Op 7-aug.-2010 om 01:12 heeft Pieter Colpaert
> <pieter.colpaert at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> I explained the concept of an API to someone and
> used the iRail API as
> > >> an example.
> > >> I build a wrapper to explain how things work, and
> tonight I worked
> > >> that example out to a full wrapper of Pieter's
> API.
> > >> (wrappers lower the the threshold for developers
> to use the API, I've
> > >> noticed this myself, especially in the Flash
> community, as an author
> > >> of a wrapper for Google's webservices, because
> there are a lot of
> > >> people with not much experience or not much time,
> and when offered a
> > >> wrapper, they're more eager to dig in).
> > >> The full source is (was) included as an
> attachment.
> > >
> > > Thanks, we will feature these wrappers on our
> website soon. Are you
> > > willing to keep it up to date?
> > >
> > >> On testing, I stumbled on something piculiar, one
> of the suggested
> > >> routes was a bus.
> > >> Feature or bug?
> > > Feature
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Further I have a few (API-)feature requests
> > >> * A way to find a station by an input, such
> as Google Suggest
> > >> with a few limited results, for
> auto-completion for example.
> > >> (indeed this can be done with the full
> list, but I was
> > >> suggesting this to avoid traffic to
> download the full list)
> > >
> > > You should only download the entire list once, or
> include it in the
> > > application. When stations are added however, you
> might want to update
> > > this list. That's why this API function exists.
> > >
> > >> * A stationslist ordered hierarchally,
> structered by zone (with
> > >> a zone I mean a set of stations in one
> city). -> drop that,
> > >> Pieter got a very good point
> > >
> > > Thanks ;-)
> > >
> > >> * Possibllity to pass on to the API if the
> given date & time is
> > >> arrival or departure time.
> > >
> > > Fixed and commited:
> > >
> http://github.com/Tuinslak/iRail/commit/5f462523119d8022083b4e710844f743ed99efd3
> > >
> > > should be on the http://dev.irail.be/api pretty
> soon now...
> > >
> > >> * ADDED: Possibllity to pass on the means of
> travel in the API,
> > >> (for example: trains only, trains and
> busses, ...) (I would
> > >> suggest to use an index, for example: -1
> is all, 0 is only
> > >> trains,...)
> > >
> > > I don't like this idea. I think buses should be
> included if necessary
> > > (as is default). What do others think of this
> idea?
> > >
> > > Pieter
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > iRail mailing list
> > > iRail at list.irail.be
> > > http://lists.rootspirit.com/mailman/listinfo/irail
> > _______________________________________________
> > iRail mailing list
> > iRail at list.irail.be
> > http://lists.rootspirit.com/mailman/listinfo/irail
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> iRail mailing list
> iRail at list.irail.be
> http://lists.rootspirit.com/mailman/listinfo/irail
>
>
>
>
> --
> Joris Timmerman
> joris.timmerman at gmail.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Joris Timmerman
> joris.timmerman at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> iRail mailing list
> iRail at list.irail.be
> http://lists.rootspirit.com/mailman/listinfo/irail
More information about the iRail
mailing list