[iRail] The NMBS results are hiding a lot of delays!
Pieter Colpaert
pieter.colpaert at gmail.com
Sun Jan 9 15:51:05 UTC 2011
I have noticed the HAFAS lack of correct data lately as well. Maybe it's
better that we rely only on railtime for realtime information instead?
Pieter
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 16:15 +0100, Jan Fabry wrote:
> Maybe the HAFAS module "forgets" delays for trains that already arrived? Today is not the best day to test for delays, the weather is too nice to have many of them!
>
> Greetings,
>
> Jan Fabry
>
> On 09 Jan 2011, at 15:50, Christophe Versieux wrote:
>
> > Hello all!
> >
> > While testing the application in order to make a cool update, I just noticed that the NMBS and the HAFAS module (the API) are giving wrong results compared to railtime/infrabel.
> >
> > Have a look at the screenshot in attachment, you can see a lot of delays in Infrabel information, between 5 and 40 minutes!
> >
> > These delays are not reported in the API & in the NMBS website!
> >
> > I think that that should be interesting to make these results public.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Pieter, when you ask me why I don't use the API for liveboards, you have your answer. I currently use Infrabel information that always give me better results.
> >
> >
> >
> > <Capture d’écran 2011-01-09 à 15.42.06.png>
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Christophe
> > <Capture d’écran 2011-01-09 à 15.42.06.png>_______________________________________________
> > iRail mailing list
> > iRail at list.irail.be
> > http://lists.rootspirit.com/mailman/listinfo/irail
>
> _______________________________________________
> iRail mailing list
> iRail at list.irail.be
> http://lists.rootspirit.com/mailman/listinfo/irail
--
+32 (0) 486 74 71 22
iRail vzw/asbl
http://project.iRail.be
More information about the iRail
mailing list