[kforge-dev] Re: release and iteration plans
Rufus Pollock
rufus.pollock at okfn.org
Sun Jan 15 12:24:30 UTC 2006
John Bywater wrote:
> Hi Rufus,
>
> Regarding the release plan [1], is the list of use cases in order? Shall
> I take the top 4.5 weeks worth forward for the first iteration plan? I
> think I will break the stories into tasks, and try to plan/estimate
> things a bit more.
I have now updated this page to break it up and it now is as follows
(note there is no iteration 3 because of reduction in CLI use case --
see comments further below -- and the removal of the wordpress plugin
use case):
http://www.okfn.org/kforge/wiki/KforgeRoadmap
= Release Plan =
== Release 1.0 ==
End date: 2006-03 (end)
* 3 iterations and an assumed velocity of 4.5 per iteration
* For use case summary see KforgeDev/UseCases
* bracketed items are not use cases but work items deriving from
refactoring or improvement of existing system
=== Iteration 1 ===
* refactor/improve permissions system (see KforgeBacklog)
* url layout (see KforgeBacklog)
* KforgeDev/UseCases/UseCase38 -- Project is purged
* KforgeDev/UseCases/UseCase39 -- Project is undeleted
* KforgeDev/UseCases/UseCase40 -- User is purged
* KforgeDev/UseCases/UseCase41 -- User is undeleted
* KforgeDev/UseCases/UseCase43 -- The service is administered from a
command line interface
=== Iteration 2 ===
* KforgeDev/UseCases/UseCase15 -- Registered person registers
themselves as member of a project
* KforgeDev/UseCases/UseCase44 -- Request new password (or a
reminder) if old has been lost
* KforgeDev/UseCases/UseCase45 -- Improve deployment so that python
package dependencies are enforced (use setuptools?)
> Also, for "The service is administered from a command line interface",
> are we talking about the kforge system-service, or a project-plugin
> service? In other words, are we talking about finishing kforge-admin, or
> adding support for Service domain object instances. During the release
> planning meeting, I assumed the former.
I think this should be fairly minimal and consist only of reflecting in
the CLI what exists in the command layer (or even some subset of the
commands). I think it should include things not available from the kui
such as:
1. purging and undeleting things
2. creating plugins
3. (re)setting passwords for users
For more complex actions I think it might be better to simply use the
python interface rather than reinventing this in our own interactive
environment. For example setting a role for person X on project Y is:
import kforge.dom
r = kforge.dom.DomainRegistry()
y = r.projects['Y']
x = r.persons['X']
member = y.members[x]
member.role = r.roles['roleName']
member.save()
While this could be made simpler by the provision of a specific command
in the CLI I don't think it is worth making that effort until we know
there is a clear need.
Regards,
Rufus
More information about the kforge-dev
mailing list