[od-discuss] Move to non-conformant?!: UK PSI (Public Sector Information) Click-Use Licence (was no endorsement clauses and OKD conformance (was Re: Up and Coming: Open Government Licence in Canada (OGL-C))) [UNCLASSIFIED]

[Ellis, Jo]

I can confirm that the PSI Click-Use Licence is indeed effectively obsolete as Andrew says.


From: Andrew Stott [mailto:andrew.stott at dirdigeng.com]
Sent: 10 December 2012 23:03
To: od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
Subject: Re: [od-discuss] Move to non-conformant?!: UK PSI (Public Sector Information) Click-Use Licence (was no endorsement clauses and OKD conformance (was Re: Up and Coming: Open Government Licence in Canada (OGL-C)))

+1

Although the Click-Use Licence can still be found on some UK government websites, it is not a licence that forms part of the current UK Government Licensing Framework (https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/government-licensing/licence-models.htm).  I suspect that it is effectively obsolete.



From: od-discuss-bounces at lists.okfn.org [mailto:od-discuss-bounces at lists.okfn.org] On Behalf Of Herb Lainchbury
Sent: 10 December 2012 22:19
To: Mike Linksvayer
Cc: od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
Subject: Re: [od-discuss] Move to non-conformant?!: UK PSI (Public Sector Information) Click-Use Licence (was no endorsement clauses and OKD conformance (was Re: Up and Coming: Open Government Licence in Canada (OGL-C)))


+1
On Dec 10, 2012 1:38 PM, "Mike Linksvayer" <ml at gondwanaland.com<mailto:ml at gondwanaland.com>> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Mike Linksvayer <ml at gondwanaland.com<mailto:ml at gondwanaland.com>> wrote:
> Also the UK PSI click-use license
> http://opendefinition.org/licenses/ukpsi/ has a no-endorsement clause
> and is on the conformant list, but ought be removed for lots of other
> problems, whatever we decide about may-not-imply-endorsement:
>     "not use the Material for the principal purpose of advertising or
> promoting a particular product or service, or in a way which could
> imply that it is endorsed by a Department or a Public Sector
> Organisation;"

I don't know how the UK PSI Click-Use Licence got on the conformant
list -- it has been there since at least
http://web.archive.org/web/20071227230454/http://opendefinition.org/licenses/<http://web.archive.org/web/20071227230454/http:/opendefinition.org/licenses/>
-- prior to any OD list archives.

It is very clearly NOT conformant. A probably incomplete list of
clauses that make it so:

    6. How the Material may be reproduced

Does not grant permission to make any adaptation -- only translations
"by a competent translator" and conversion to formats for the vision
impaired. Not conformant with OKD #3.

Nearly every point in the Obligations section is problematic. Some are
odd for a public license (which this tries not to be), so I'll just
note the problematic ones that have been discussed recently regarding
UK OGL -- may-not-imply-endorsement and do-not-mislead:

    9.6 not use the Material for the principal purpose of advertising
or promoting a particular product or service, or in a way which could
imply that it is endorsed by a Department or a Public Sector
Organisation;

    9.7 not use the Material in any way that is likely to mislead others;

Of course the first part of 9.6 is also non-conformant with OKD#8.


Can I get a couple +1's on moving this to non-conformant with the
above rationale?

Mike

_______________________________________________
od-discuss mailing list
od-discuss at lists.okfn.org<mailto:od-discuss at lists.okfn.org>
http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
National Archives Disclaimer
 
This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete the email. 
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of The National Archives are neither given nor endorsed by it.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/attachments/20121212/74015c39/attachment-0001.html>