[od-discuss] OD conformant proposal: Open Government Licence v2.0 [] [UNCLASSIFIED]

Thu Jun 27 13:05:07 UTC 2013

That's great news, thank you all!

Jo

Jo Ellis 
Information Policy Manager
The National Archives
nationalarchives.gov.uk 

Sign up to The National Archives' Re-users and Licensees RSS Feed to get the latest news updates on Public Sector Information.

-----Original Message-----
From: mlinksva at gmail.com [mailto:mlinksva at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mike Linksvayer
Sent: 26 June 2013 20:47
To: Rufus Pollock
Cc: Luis Villa; Ellis, Jo; od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
Subject: Re: [od-discuss] OD conformant proposal: Open Government Licence v2.0 []

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org> wrote:
> On 24 June 2013 21:30, Mike Linksvayer <ml at gondwanaland.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Luis Villa <luis at lu.is> wrote:
>>> +1 for OSD-compliance.
>>
>> You mean OD. :)
>>
>> We also have +1s on-list from Andrew Stott, Herb Lainchbury, and me, 
>> and off-list from Baden Appleyard, Rachel Bruce, and Jo Walsh. That's 
>> 7. Can we have one more to get over 50%?
>
> I'm +1.

Great; I think we can consider the UK OGL 2.0 final version provided to be approved as OD compliant. Will add to the site's list of conformant licenses when the license is released.

Jo and Rufus especially, feel free to follow up here or privately if there's anything you'd like to do to coordinate publicity. I imagine this is worth mention on the main OKFN blog? Happy to draft something very brief.

Mike

Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

National Archives Disclaimer

This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete the email. 
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of The National Archives are neither given nor endorsed by it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------