[od-discuss] Fwd: [cc-licenses] 4.0: fourth (and final) license draft ready for comment

[Kat Walsh]

I can do this for the BY and BY-SA licenses.

Cheers,
Kat


On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Mike Linksvayer <ml at gondwanaland.com>wrote:

> Yes, we should. I don't expect any problem with approval, but if
> anyone would volunteer to fill out questions in
> http://opendefinition.org/licenses/process/ for BY and BY-SA 4.0,
> that'd be great.
>
> Mike
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Leigh Dodds <leigh at ldodds.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do we need to pick this up again now that the 4.0 licences have been
> released?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > L.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Mike Linksvayer <ml at gondwanaland.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hi, as mentioned previously, I'd like this group to be able to say
> >> that CC-BY-4.0 and CC-BY-SA-4.0 conform with the Open Definition,
> >> holding them to the same standard any other license is held to.
> >>
> >> CC has just published a 4th and maybe final draft of CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0.
> >> Obviously NonCommercial makes this non-open, but it's easy to ignore
> >> the NC parts and see whether BY and BY-SA will have problems. I don't
> >> think they will. Here are a couple areas where licenses have problems,
> >> and why, BY and BY-SA based on this draft won't (but I encourage
> >> scrutinizing by all, and if anything found, raising it immediately):
> >>
> >> * No endorsement. No permission is given to imply endorsement,
> >> non-problematic (cf ensure you do not use ... to imply endorsement,
> >> which is a problem)
> >> * Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public
> >> License. Which is OK (cf license not applying if other rights are
> >> present, which is a problem)
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Diane Peters <diane at creativecommons.org>
> >> Date: Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:03 PM
> >> Subject: [cc-licenses] 4.0: fourth (and final) license draft ready for
> comment
> >> To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <
> cc-licenses at lists.ibiblio.org>
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> Thanks so much for your patience as we concluded a final review of
> draft 4
> >> following our Global Summit in Argentina.  We have now published draft
> 4 on
> >> the staging server, and associated explanatory materials on the wiki.
> >>
> >>    - Blog post <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/39587
> >highlighting
> >>    key changes and issues for comment
> >>    - BY-NC-SA<
> http://staging.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode>(the
> >> other five will be published in the next few days)
> >>    - Comparison of d3 and d4 of BY-NC-SA
> >> [PDF<
> http://wiki.creativecommons.org/images/0/02/Comparison_draft_3_to_draft_4.pdf
> >
> >>    ]
> >>    - Main d4 discussion page
> >> <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0/Draft_4>with further explanations
> >> and links to individual issues pages with d4
> >>    treatment
> >>
> >> This will be an abbreviated discussion period, lasting only about two
> >> weeks.  We look forward to hearing from you on this list.
> >>
> >> Diane
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> od-discuss mailing list
> >> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> >> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
> >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Leigh Dodds
> > Freelance Technologist
> > Open Data, Linked Data Geek
> > t: @ldodds
> > w: ldodds.com
> > e: leigh at ldodds.com
> _______________________________________________
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/attachments/20131126/724d97b2/attachment-0003.html>