[odc-discuss] Database Contents Licence (formerly the FIL)

[Jonathan Rochkind]

That helps, thanks Jordan.

Can you ODbL the database, even if some of the data in the database may 
have third-parties with rights to it in various jurisdictions?

I think "early adopters" of this suite of stuff for library 
bibliographic data may currently not be using them correctly. Guidance 
is desperately needed.

Jonathan

Jordan S Hatcher wrote:
> On 30 Apr 2009, at 16:19, Anders Söderbäck wrote:
>
>   
>> Anyway, when licensing library data, I guess you could use both the  
>> ODbL and the DbCL together, just to be safe.
>>     
>
> I'll try to address your other points when I can, but this one I  
> wanted to clarify immediately.
>
> The DbCL is meant to be used only with the ODbL.
>
> The ODbL will cover the Database.  The DbCL will cover the contents of  
> that database.
>
> It's the difference between a text field name (licensed under the ODbL  
> as part of the database) and the text in the field (licensed under the  
> DbCL).
>
> ~Jordan
>
> ____
> Mr. Jordan S Hatcher, JD, LLM
>
> jordan [at] opencontentlawyer dot com
>
> More details at:
> <http://www.jordanhatcher.com>
>
> Open Data at:
> <http://www.opendatacommons.org>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> odc-discuss mailing list
> odc-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/odc-discuss
>