[odc-discuss] ODbL statement in Linked Data?

[Mike Linksvayer]

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>wrote:

> On 22 June 2011 17:36, Mike Linksvayer <ml at creativecommons.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
> wrote:
> >> As a license uri use:
> >>
> >> <http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0>
> >
> > I'd be nice if that didn't redirect to
> > http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/ if it is the
> > intended canonical URI for the license. Not necessary, just a nit.
>
> Right again, should be:
>
> <http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/>
>
> Making me wonder if we should use for canonical url:
>
> <http://opendatacommons.org/id/licenses/odbl/1.0>
>

Why would you do that? I strongly recommend canonical url being what users
will see in their browser -- that's what gets copy&pasted. This isn't
particular to licenses, but just about anything with a URL.

-- 
https://creativecommons.net/ml
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/odc-discuss/attachments/20110622/7c0ae2da/attachment-0001.html>