[okfn-advisory] Revitalising Open Knowledge and role of the Council

glyn moody glyn.moody at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 13:31:41 UTC 2018


Good points, good questions...

On 11 April 2018 at 14:29, Laura James <lbjames at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mark, Paul,
>
> Thanks for speaking with some of us today, and recognising how things have
> been, externally, in the last 3 years.  Also thanks to other Council members
> for insightful questions.
>
> I think you should consider what you, as the leadership team, need or want
> from advisors such as ourselves. Both from what you said, and reading
> between the lines, you face fairly significant challenges, and so must
> prioritise with care. Attending to the Council may or may not be a priority.
>
> The Council is a mixture of more and less active 'open' leaders and experts,
> and Chapter representatives.  You owe the latter some time and
> consideration, I think. The rest of us - most of whom joined before 2013 -
> may or may not be useful or relevant to the current state of the open
> knowledge landscape, and/or the challenges you face. If we are not all
> useful, I am not sure that you should feel a duty to 'repair relationships'
> with us - this is hard and time-consuming work. (Speaking for myself, but I
> am fairly certain also for some others, we would understand if you chose to
> focus elsewhere, if we are not what you need.) Also, are there other key
> people who are not on the Council, who could provide sage advice?
>
> If you want to work more with us, I am left with some thoughts/questions:
>
> You described the projects underway, but not the rationale for them. Are the
> current projects what you want to be doing, or simply legacy you are stuck
> with? Is there strategy behind their selection, or is it just 'whatever we
> can get funded'? Are there things you want to be doing, but need assistance
> to secure funds or partnerships? If so, could some of us help? (Some Council
> members, if willing, may be able to help repair damaged relationships with
> key funders or stakeholders, as they can lend reputation and confidence.)
>
> You described advocacy around open as being the work of individuals now
> around OKI and the network, rather than a core task. If this is still of
> importance, even if distributed and informal, what are the key issues or
> messages? If Council members wish to help, how can they get involved, who
> should they connect with? (Many Council members are open advocates of old,
> and this may be an area where we can assist informally with little
> investment from OKI, but to some good effect.)
>
> If the strategy is in flux, and you are reassessing the landscape and
> potential gaps or opportunities, that might be something concrete some of
> the Council could assist with, collectively or individually.  As noted
> today, the movement has evolved and changed. Reclaiming the centre may well
> be impossible, but there are likely still some gaps where an organisation
> with good staff and long standing reputation may be able to add value.
>
> Good luck. Open Knowledge is a challenging thing to shepherd and support.
>
> Laura
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-advisory mailing list
> okfn-advisory at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-advisory
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-advisory
>



-- 
Best wishes

Glyn

http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/glynmoody
http://identi.ca/glynmoody
https://plus.google.com/+glynmoody/

Please use PGP key servers (e.g. http://kerckhoffs.surfnet.nl/) to
confirm following:

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=wFDl
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----



More information about the okfn-advisory mailing list