[@OKFNau] Open Data Index 2014

Thu Dec 25 09:18:29 UTC 2014

Thanks for your feedback on this Steve-very insightful :-) 

Rosie Williams BA (Sociology)________________________________________

 NoFibs.com.au - Open Data Reporter InfoAus.net - Founder and Developer 

From: stevage at gmail.com
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:16:12 +1100
To: okfn-au at lists.okfn.org
Subject: Re: [@OKFNau] Open Data Index 2014

Hi Paul,  Thanks for bringing this up. IMOH, the mix of datasets that make up the index could be improved. The census tries to cover both transparency (open government) and utility/service data, which makes a weird mix.
* National map: a single shapefile - how does this make the top 10 important datasets, in a world of OpenStreetMap? Seems a bit ridiculous.* Government Budget: hooray for Pia!* Election Results: a worthy inclusion, and genuinely reflects well on Australia* National Statistics: a service-oriented dataset, useful but hard to define. The ABS data is notoriously hard to work with directly, which is why companies like id.com.au exist as resellers. Still, the fact that the ABS provides (almost?) all of their data free of charge is worth celebrating.* Postcodes: seems out of place in the top 10 (perhaps related to a previous fight in the UK for this data). Street addresses would be far more useful, and are the #1 and #2 most requested datasets on data.gov.au: https://datagovau.ideascale.com/a/index* Government spending: Ok. Would be great to have political donations in the list.* Company register: I'm ambivalent. Is it so important?* Pollutant emissions: A couple of environmental contacts have been pretty skeptical of the value of NPI data, but good I guess.* Transport Timetables: This is a weird category to have in a national census, and I feel like Australia is getting points a bit too easily here. Countries like France or Germany have nationalised (and internationally-connected) systems with the time of every train leaving at any of thousands of stations around the country - and it's all available online. We have a bunch of different websites for every different "national" train line with its own independent way of presenting non-machine-readable data (some of which seems to be offline: http://www.queenslandrailtravel.com.au/RailServices/Pages/TheInlander-Westboundtimetable.aspx, http://www.thegulflander.com.au/) - and we still get 45%? There's not even a centralised dataset to speak of, it's just a bunch of independent companies that happen to provide similar information, in non-standardised ways.* Legislation: a worthy inclusion, but it seems a bit arbitrary to include Legislation, but not parliamentary debate (Hansard) or court proceedings (AustLII).
Steve
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Paul Walsh <paulywalsh at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I just realised that there was no announcement on this list for the release of the Open Data Index (was last week).
The Index is here:
http://index.okfn.org
Australia’s performance is here:
http://index.okfn.org/place/australia/
Or, relative to other places in the Index:
http://index.okfn.org/place/
Australia improved rank in the Index this year, and I think it is important that the open data community on the list is aware of the data :).
I developed the new Index site, so if anyone has any questions feel free.
Best,
Paul

_______________________________________________

okfn-au mailing list

okfn-au at lists.okfn.org

https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-au

Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-au

_______________________________________________
okfn-au mailing list
okfn-au at lists.okfn.org
https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-au
Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-au 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-au/attachments/20141225/1ea94bf4/attachment-0004.html>