[okfn-discuss] Re: Open data licensing

[Paul Miller]

Nate, all

In a previous role, I funded some research to look at the applicability of
CC to (UK) public sector resources.

The report, from 2005, is here - http://www.intrallect.com/cie-study/

Paul


On 24/5/07 18:09, Nate Olson wrote:

> Rufus,
> 
> This sounds like a good idea, both to clear away current confusion
> and to improve understanding on new issues as they arise. And as you
> suggest, the work done here could pretty seamlessly be tied in with
> other OKF project areas.
> 
> Something that might be worth inclusion is a brief overview of
> Creative Commons--not so much its philosophy as its practical
> function. More to the point, I'd like to see a thorough diagnosis of
> CC's shortcomings, framed in terms of constructive criticism, of
> wanting to ensure it's as relevant and as resilient as possible. I
> say this as someone who, like most, isn't too familiar with IP laws
> and customs, and who regards CC in a rather uncritical light as the
> "people's champ" fighting various bogeymen. But that's obviously not
> healthy over the long term.
> 
> Here's one recent item that jarred me a little bit in this regard
> (although this is *not* all that constructive!):
> 
> http://blog.fawny.org/2007/05/15/anticommons/
> 
> For starters, can anyone point to existing writing on CC's pros/cons
> that they find particularly thoughtful, and accessible to a general
> audience?
> 
> Nate
> 
>> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 12:55:45 +0100
>> From: Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
>> Subject: [okfn-discuss] Open data licensing
>> To: okfn-discuss <okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org>
>> 
>> Attending XTech last week certainly demonstrated the rapidly growing
>> interest in Open Data/Knowledge issues. In particular there quite a
>> bit
>> of discussions (and uncertainty) both about the legal status of
>> data and
>> what approaches to use when licensing it.
>> 
>> Given this and the lengthy discussions last month sparked by Jo's post
>> on copyright not being applicable to geodata[1] I'd like to suggest
>> starting work on a mini-project with these two goals:
>> 
>>    1. Producing a guide to (open) data licensing
>>    2. Getting a list of licenses compatible with the Open Knowledge/
>> Data
>> Definition which are suitable for use with data
>> 
>> As a start I've put up a page where we can start drafting here:
>> 
>>    http://okfn.org/wiki/OpenDataLicensing
>> 
>> Please dive in and post any comments or suggestions either on the wiki
>> or to here.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Rufus
>> 
>> [1]: http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/2007-April/
>> 000389.html
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss

-- 
Dr Paul Miller
Senior Manager & Technology Evangelist, Talis
w: www.talis.com/       m: +44 (7769) 740083
im: talis_paul at mac.com [AIM, MSN and iChat]
skype: napm1971
--
 
Find out more about Talis at  www.talis.com
Shared InnovationTM

 
Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be those of Talis Information Ltd. The content of this email message and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the usage of the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, then please return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this e-mail by an unauthorised recipient is prohibited.
 
 
Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies and is registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office at Knights Court, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB.