[okfn-discuss] Open Software Service Definition

[Thorsten Glaser]

Dave Crossland dixit:

>> > 2. Whose source code is:
>> > A. Free/Open Source Software (that is available under a
>> >     license in the OSI or FSF approved list
>
>This should be boolean AND instead of OR because the FSF and OSI lists

That should be “OSD conformant and Free Software according to the FSF’s
definition”, as we all know just how much OSI sucks regarding approval
of “just another” copycenter licence, while dealing a lot with copyleft
licences. OSD conformance has almost nothing to do with OSI approval.

//mirabilos
-- 
Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh-
ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates irrelevant
detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions
in English text in bold font.	-- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C"