[okfn-discuss] GFDL updates, compatibility, and confusion

[graham simpson]

COULD YOU PLEASE STOP SENDING ME JUNK TO MY EMAIL.BOX THANKS.

On 5/19/08, Benj. Mako Hill <mako at atdot.cc> wrote:
> <quote who="jo at frot.org" date="Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:27:37AM -0700">
> > Understood. Looking at the original writing on "free documentation"
> > principles, of which the GFDL is an example, it seems quit clear that
> > GFDL was designed specifically for *technical documentation of software*.
> > ( http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-doc.html )
>
> I would go even farther. I would say that it was designed for the
> manual for GNU software as published by the Free Software Foundation!
>
> > However I don't see how GFDL 1.2 is considered "free" according to the
> > Free Cultural Works Definition ("the license must not limit the
> > freedom to distribute a modified version ... regardless of the intent and
> > purpose of such modifications.") but that is probably a conversation
> > for some other mailing list :)
>
> I think that the definition should probably specify that a work is only
> free if it contains no invariant sections. If it is (and most GFDL works
> including Wikipedia are) then it really is quite a lot more like BY-SA.
>
> Regards,
> Mako
>
> --
> Benjamin Mako Hill
> mako at atdot.cc
> http://mako.cc/
>
> Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far
> as society is free to use the results. --GNU Manifesto
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIML65ic1LIWB1WeYRAgSPAKDhbqKz+z1RsjEWOIRYuKNLiHKfpwCZAbxr
> Cq6pjWwEDCUFwB6LJzECy9E=
> =Lf7r
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
>
>
>