[okfn-discuss] Open Software Service Definition
Thorsten Glaser
tg at mirbsd.de
Wed Sep 3 10:36:03 UTC 2008
Dave Crossland dixit:
>Referring to approved license lists is unambiguous. When writing a
>definition that depends on other definitions, it is good to limit
>ambiguity.
1) The OSI list of approved licences is not a definition. The OSD is.
2) You have to weigh between ambiguity and the OSI's _admitted_ and
_willingly_ done discrimination against licences with less (or
less well-known) "community" (users, licence writers, etc).
I for one would advise to not follow OSI's discriminatory actions.
//mirabilos
--
Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh-
ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates irrelevant
detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions
in English text in bold font. -- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C"
More information about the okfn-discuss
mailing list