[okfn-discuss] French translation

[Jérôme Beau]

Hi Rufus,

So far I haven't seen it published. Is it normal or is there something I can
do to help (any other typos to fix or something) ?

With best regards,

   Jérôme.

2009/2/24 Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>

> My french is only so-so (!) but what you've got there now definitely
> looks better. We'll aim to have this up on the
> http://www.opendefinition.org site soon.
>
> Thanks once again for all your help.
>
> Rufus
>
> 2009/2/24 Jérôme Beau <javarome at gmail.com>:
> > Thanks for the feedback Rufus.
> >
> > I did found some differences between the autoritative version and the one
> I
> > used as a basis for translation. This now fixed. Feel free to let me know
> if
> > it looks now better to you.
> >
> > 2009/2/23 Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
> >>
> >> 2009/2/21 Jérôme Beau <javarome at gmail.com>:
> >> > I posted a first version at http://rr0.org/okd/annotated
> >> > (there is no link to the page wherever except in this message to the
> >> > list. I
> >> > just posted it as a web page for formating convenience).
> >>
> >> This looks great Jérôme. Once we've got this finalized we can upload
> >> the translation to the relevant page on the
> >> http://www.opendefinition.org/ with a link back to you.
> >>
> >> > It seems to be that some errors remains in the original OKD licence,
> due
> >> > to
> >> > elements taken from the Open Software Definition (OSD) : in the
> sentence
> >> > of
> >> > item 9, it says that "The rights attached to the work must apply to
> all
> >> > to
> >> > whom the *program* is redistributed". I guess the program should be
> >> > replaced
> >> > by the *work*, no? Same in "closing up *software* by indirect means
> such
> >> > as
> >> > requiring a non-disclosure agreement." where software should be
> replaced
> >> > by
> >> > work.
> >>
> >> Hmm, these are typos in the annotated version. I think these have been
> >> corrected in the main, authoritative version at:
> >>
> >> http://www.opendefinition.org/1.0/
> >>
> >> We have also merged the 'comments' into the main version (so the
> >> annotated version can be deprecated at some point to avoid these kind
> >> of issues).
> >>
> >> Would you mind taking a quick look at the authoritative version and
> >> checking your synced with that?
> >>
> >> Rufus
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/attachments/20090424/330a92e9/attachment.html>