[okfn-discuss] Suggestion to sign the Declaration on Parliamentary Openness

[Pedro Markun]

Hey all,

just received an email from Andrew saying that more then 50 orgs signed for
the Declaration. Cool :)

The OKFN appears a few times (both as Germany and UK).
Do you think it's worthy signing it as OKFN-Br as well?

We've been participating a lot on those discussions, so I would think it
makes sense. But then again don't know if it's worthy having every local
chapter signing it separately?

[]'s
Pedro Markun

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Daniel Dietrich
<daniel.dietrich at okfn.org>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I suggest we go ahead and sign the Declaration on Parliamentary Openness
> as nobody opposed.
>
> All the best
> Daniel
>
> On 14 Jul 2012, at 20:04, Daniel Dietrich wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to suggest the OKFN to sign the Declaration on
> Parliamentary Openness:
> > http://www.openingparliament.org/declaration
> >
> > The declaration is currently in draft modus awaiting comments here:
> > http://publicmarkup.org/bill/opening-parliament-declaration/
> >
> > The Declaration will be publicly announced on 15 September at the
> "International Day of Democracy", at the World e-Parliament Conference 2012
> in Rom, see: http://www.ictparliament.org/
> >
> > Interesting for some people at the OKFN is the proposed technical
> collaboration around PMO sites using a shared technology stack. Discussion
> about this will take place at: transparency-tech at googlegroups.com
> >
> > What do people think?
> >
> > All best
> > Daniel
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/attachments/20120808/1115dd05/attachment.html>