[okfn-discuss] Problems of nomenclature

Mike Linksvayer ml at creativecommons.org
Mon Mar 5 19:42:24 UTC 2012


On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Chris Sakkas <sanglorian at gmail.com> wrote:
> As an update on the second half of the discussion, about a term for
> copyleft-like terms, I've settled on 'share-alike' rather than 'reciprocal'.
> That's because I could find a reference to share-alike that was broader than
> copyleft (in the Open Data Handbook!) but 'reciprocal licence' seems to have
> only been used to refer to copyleft licences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_source#Microsoft_Limited_Reciprocal_License_.28Ms-LRL.29
:-/

Mike




More information about the okfn-discuss mailing list