[okfn-discuss] Annotating Open Images with licence and authorship to prevent copyfraud

Thu Aug 8 10:31:54 UTC 2013

Right, so the image metadata sections of image formats are insufficient for
this purpose? I can see how people (well, ill-intentioned publishers I
guess) might just mangle that section as it's much easier to edit than
actual pixels... I also guess you considered this option, but am interested
in why it was rejected.

On 7 August 2013 23:30, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> Brilliant - this was exactly what I was indicating - you have done it much
> better.
>
>
>
> --
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> +44-1223-763069
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/attachments/20130808/0b3bf5e4/attachment.html>