[okfn-discuss] Free Software tools for OKFN -- please contribute

Aaron Wolf wolftune at gmail.com
Fri Nov 29 21:01:43 UTC 2013


Obviously, the OKF is going to take the view that "Open" is term here. OKF
even creates the Open Definition which is based on the Open Source
definition from OSI.

I personally go with FLO to combine these terms. Both Free and Open are
easy to be unclear what it really means, but in the context of the OKF,
everyone is going to easily get that *they* mean Open per their own
definition.

--
Aaron Wolf
wolftune.com


On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Gene Shackman <eval_gene at yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> If you want to sell this to the public, you need a better term than "free"
> (and not "libre"). Because people will think free means free to use. "Free
> and open" might do it. Most people probably have some vague idea what open
> means. Or "free and open source".
>
> Gene
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 10:28 AM PST William Waites wrote:
>
> >
> >Free Software has a well accepted definition:
> >
> >    https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/attachments/20131129/e4a56355/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the okfn-discuss mailing list