[okfn-discuss] OKFN and Reset the Net

[John Baxter]

I think 'consensus' is going to far.  'Consent' at best.  It was a limited
consultation, that arrived at a new position due to a strong response from
a vocal segment (minority?).

I don't really mind either way but I think the suggested initial position
was pretty reasonable, and probably the most reasonable position.
I still don't see the relationship, but if people are happy to endorse it
then why not.

I think the conduct of some of the pro-RtN segment on this thread was
borderline antagonistic/unacceptable.  Lucky I'm not the decision maker ; )
ᐧ


*John Baxter*
jsbaxter.com.au <http://www.jsbaxter.com.au>
0405 447 829
@jsbaxter_


On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> Well done - this is an excellent example of how open discussion can
> rapidly come to a practical consensus. It also leaves a mail trail so we
> can look back in a few months time and see what issues we have discussed
> and how they turned out.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:59 PM, William Waites <ww at eris.okfn.org> wrote:
>
>> > All the input today has been really helpful, and so Open Knowledge is
>> > now endorsing Reset the Net, as a significant initiative in an area
>> > with a strong bearing on our work. We've tweeted, Facebooked, and
>> > signed up on the site :)
>>
>> Horray! Well done and thank you.
>>
>> -w
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> okfn-discuss mailing list
>> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> +44-1223-763069
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/attachments/20140606/9db5102e/attachment-0002.html>