[okfn-discuss] Right to be forgotten ruling

Mon May 19 22:48:18 UTC 2014

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:23:27AM +0200, Rayna wrote:
> 2014-05-20 0:17 GMT+02:00 stef <s at ctrlc.hu>:
> 
> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:05:36AM +0200, Rayna wrote:
> > > Following up on Rufus's questions, I have another one: whether the
> > verdict
> > > will include a provision making public interest outweigh personal desire.
> >
> > i don't think this matters at all. this is quite similar to the censorship
> > of metadata linked from the piratebay.
> >
> 
> I am not sure I understand the subtleties (or lackthereof) you are trying
> to convey: may you elaborate?

both are search-engines, both provide links/metadata to 3rd party content. if
the e-commerce directive was worth anything then there wouldn't be
intermediary liability and thus no grounds for this.

-- 
otr fp: https://www.ctrlc.hu/~stef/otr.txt