[OKFN-FR] Fwd: [open-science] IPCC report

[Pierre Chrzanowski]

Bonjour à tous,

Le rapport du GIEC (draft) est disponible. Mais Peter pointe à juste titre
le manque d'ouverture (open access) des références biblios.

Pierre

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:07 AM
Subject: [open-science] IPCC report
To: open-science <open-science at lists.okfn.org>
Cc: okfn-discuss <okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org>


The IPCC report (
http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGIAR5_WGI-12Doc2b_FinalDraft_All.pdf,
) was published in draft yesterday
WORKING GROUP I CONTRIBUTION TO THE IPCC FIFTH ASSESSMENT REPORT
CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS

This is a critically important document for the human race. Yet how much of
the science is Open? How accessible is it?

One immediate concern is that many of the 9000+ references are closed. Can
we highlight this concern , e.g. by Crowdcrafting the analysis of the
references? How many are closed? How much would it cost a concerned citizen
(or group of citizens) to read all the references?

-- 
Peter Murray-Rust
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069

_______________________________________________
open-science mailing list
open-science at lists.okfn.org
http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science




-- 
*Pierre Chrzanowski*
*Open Knowledge Foundation France*

Mail: pierre.chrzanowski at gmail.com
Mobile: +33 (0)7 855 71 292 | Skype: pierre.chrzanowski | Twitter:
@piezanowski <https://twitter.com/piezanowski>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-fr/attachments/20131001/2fc592c6/attachment-0002.html>