[Okfn-irl] Next Steps for OGP in Ireland?
Donal
donalobrol at clubi.ie
Mon Jan 27 17:06:18 UTC 2014
Dear Nat,
Arising from you email, I would appreciate clarification on two things ar
First – what is the source of funding for this new position;
Second - what exactly you mean by the following phrase
to raise awareness and to deepen capacity in civil society about how to use
a range of tools (such as freedom of information, protected disclosures,
etc.) that allow people to better inform themselves about public policy and
strengthen their participation in Ireland’s democratic processes.
Specifically, what do you/TASC mean by
1. Civil society eg. does it include local business groups?;
2. Better inform themselves about public policy
a. Do this mean being able to get information on options being
considered for public policy before these option are presented to decision
makers eg. the Local Property Tax, provision of water, location of a
national children’s hospital;
3. Strengthen their participation in Ireland’s democratic processes
a. Does this allow for new groups to emerge as issues give to public
unhappiness;
b. Does this include those who do not have the resources to spend time
in continuous contact with elected representatives and public servants, thus
finding themselves having to react to initiatives from others eg.
residents’ associations;
c. In this context, what measures – if any – do you/TASC envisage
taking in response to eg.
i. The
vote of the Constitutional Convention in favour of direct democracy;
https://www.constitution.ie/AttachmentDownload.ashx?mid=f17ca0d8-240f-e311-a
203-005056a32ee4
ii. The
highly critical report (October 2013) of the Council of Europe on local
government in Ireland (see below);
https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=2113703
iii. The
closed nature of a group recently appointed by the Dept of Environment,
Community and Local Government which did not seek submissions from the
public, although the terms of reference was about citizen engagement and the
membership of which did not include any directly elected representatives
http://www.environ.ie/en/Community/CommunityVoluntarySupports/News/MainBody,
34113,en.htm
I look forward to hearing from you
Donal Ó Brolcáin
The Congress expresses its concern that:
a. the constitutional protection of local self-government is rather weak and
that the principle of subsidiarity is not properly reflected and guaranteed
in the legislation;
b. local governments do not manage a substantial share of public affairs:
local authorities are still waiting for a strong decentralisation effort and
the delegation of relevant competences and financial independence to the
local and regional level;
c. consultations with local authorities and their associations are neither
systematic nor sufficiently regulated to allow the latter to be involved in
the decision-making process on matters which concern them and, in the
present context, to make an input into the proposed reform;
d. the administrative supervision of local authorities’ activities by the
central level remains disproportionate and, under this system, the powers
given to local authorities are not full and exclusive;
e. the equalisation mechanism is not transparent and, although local
governments have the formal freedom to adopt budgets, such freedom is
severely limited in practice;
f. the scale of local taxes and the power of local authorities to determine
the rates are very limited;
g. conditions of office of local elected representatives are insufficiently
regulated by general legislation (Labour Code).
7. In the light of the above, the Congress requests that the Committee of
Ministers invite Irish authorities to take account of the following
recommendations:
a. to revise their legislation in order to ensure that the subsidiarity
principle is better enshrined and protected in the law and to promote this
basic principle in practice in the Irish public administration system;
b. to implement the Action Programme rapidly in order to devolve more powers
and responsibilities to local and regional authorities and delegate relevant
competences and financial resources to the local and regional levels;
c. to develop the procedures and mechanisms of consultation with local and
regional authorities on matters concerning them directly both in legislation
and in practice, taking into account the criteria provided by Article 4
para.6 of the Charter, namely, “in due time” and “in an appropriate way”;
d. take the necessary measures to amend existing legislation which allows
the central government to intervene in local decision making and ensure that
the Action Programme does not increase the level of supervision even more
through the establishment of a new additional National Oversight Office to
monitor the efficiency of local authorities including, inter alia, their
compliance with national objectives and policies;
e. to review the equalisation mechanism in order to render it transparent
and ensure that the rules pertaining thereto are established in consultation
with the local authorities;
f. to ensure that, in practice, local governments have the power to levy
taxes and determine effectively the rates within the limits of the law;
g. to consider establishing a clear and specific legislative basis regarding
the conditions of office of local elected representatives, particularly as
related to rules for private employers to provide “free time” to elected
officials for participation in local matters;
h. to encourage the Irish Government to consider opening the debate on
further developing the regional tier of government, with the possibility of
putting in place a system of direct election of representatives and real
responsibilities in the delivery of “regional” public services;
i. to invite the Irish Government to sign the Additional Protocol to the
European Outline Convention on Trans-frontier Co-operation between
Territorial Communities or Authorities (ETS No. 159) and the Additional
Protocol to the European Charter of Local Self-Government on the right to
participate in the affairs of a local authority (CETS No. 207).
From: okfn-irl [mailto:okfn-irl-bounces at lists.okfn.org] On Behalf Of Nat
O'Connor
Sent: 27 January 2014 13:44
To: 'Flora Fleischer'
Cc: okfn-irl at lists.okfn.org; open-data-ireland at googlegroups.com; 'Nuala
Haughey'; open-government-ireland at googlegroups.com; admin at ogpireland.ie
Subject: Re: [Okfn-irl] Next Steps for OGP in Ireland?
Dear Flora,
Thank you for your comprehensive email and your suggestions.
I wanted to share one piece of news with the group, and to make one
suggestion.
As some people on the email lists may be aware, TASC recently advertised for
a post to undertake an ‘open government project’, to raise awareness and to
deepen capacity in civil society about how to use a range of tools (such as
freedom of information, protected disclosures, etc.) that allow people to
better inform themselves about public policy and strengthen their
participation in Ireland’s democratic processes. I’m delighted to say that
we have appointed Nuala Haughey to this role, who work on the OGP
consultation process as well as in Transparency Ireland. Nuala has a depth
of knowledge about the issues involved and about how civil society
organisations work. Nuala took up the post earlier this month and she will
be taking a lead role in this area for TASC. We will be announcing more
about this project in the coming weeks.
In the meantime, as a suggestion for the engagement with officials about
Ireland’s OGP Action Plan, it might be useful for those of us working on the
civil society side to establish our own ‘forum’ or committee, so that a
wider range of people can take part, and we can make sure that there is a
good flow of information in both directions from the small number of civil
society representatives who will be taking part in the joint steering group
with officials. (A similar structure exists in homeless services, where a
larger ‘Homeless Forum’ allows civil society organisations to share
information and discuss priorities, whereas a smaller number have membership
of official boards/committees).
To discuss this, I propose another meeting of the ad hoc civil society group
that met in advance of other meetings with officials. This would also
present an opportunity for everyone who wishes to represent civil society to
put themselves forward and for us to discuss the best way of sharing
information to/from the joint committee.
I have asked Nuala Haughey to seek availability from members of the ad hoc
group who met before, and anyone from civil society is welcome to come
along.
I’ve had a suggestion from DPER that they may be in a position to meet civil
society on or after Wednesday 5th February, so I would suggest a civil
society meeting this week or early next week.
Kind regards,
Nat
Nat O'Connor MA PhD
Director
TASC – Think-tank for Action on Social Change
Second Floor, Castleriver House, 14-15 Parliament Street
Dublin 2, Ireland
Tel: +353 1 6169050
Email: noconnor at tascnet.ie
Web: www.tascnet.ie
Blog: www.progressive-economy.ie <http://www.progressive-economy.ie/>
Description: Description: cid:image001.gif at 01C9F643.59B9A470Research and
Organisation Services Ltd. TA/ TASC. Registered Address: Hill House, 26 Sion
Hill Road, Drumcondra, Dublin 9. Company No. 342993. CHY 14778.
From: daydreamer2105 at gmail.com [mailto:daydreamer2105 at gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Flora Fleischer
Sent: 22 January 2014 18:03
To: Beausang, William; O'Connor, Evelyn; McCann, Conor; Martinez, Claire
Cc: <okfn-irl at lists.okfn.org>; open-data-ireland at googlegroups.com;
open-government-ireland at googlegroups.com; admin at ogpireland.ie
Subject: Re: [Okfn-irl] Next Steps for OGP in Ireland?
Dear Evelyn,
Thank you again for sharing the Government’s initial thoughts on the state
of the OGP Action Plan as of Dec. 5th. We remain very eager to be involved
and help develop an effective and progressive first OGP Action Plan for
Ireland in useful collaboration with the Government partners assigned to
this project. Please find below our concrete suggestions on what actions we
would like to undertake to move the OGP Action Plan forward.
Link to the original Email
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzOXYk-Wh9M2MmdydDRNNWdDWER0MGxXaTg3UzJtVER
xTndN/edit>
Suggestion for Next Steps:
· Meeting between civil society, government & public service
representatives to kick off OGP process.
· All details for the process of co-creating Ireland’s 1st OGP
Action Plan to be discussed at a first meeting as soon as possible. We would
suggest early next week if this suits. Alternatively please advise on a day
that suits the relevant staff/ potential steering group members from the
Government and Public Service.
· Establish a platform for regular and ongoing dialogue with Civil
Society.
· Civil Society, Government and Public Service to decide on members
of Steering Committee and enter names here
<https://okfirl.hackpad.com/Steering-Group-Members-CP0WWElSChh>
· Suggest at least three from each area
· Members of Civil Society should be able to attend each of the
meetings to observe and take part if interested
· Share contact details of all Steering Committee members
· Discuss & initial recommendations for Civil Society process
· Please note that in line with OGP principles we would expect a
strong commitment from both the Government and Public Service staff to drive
and facilitate the Civil Society engagement process both online and offline.
· Decide which Civil Society engagement tools should be used
(Civinomics, Crowdhall <https://crowdhall.com/h/52/> , Google Moderator,
etc.). We can train how to use them.
· Initial recommendations on which of the 62 Action Plan Commitments
and 5 Submissions
<http://www.ogpireland.ie/2013/10/02/final-report-ogp-consultation/> should
be included in Ireland’s 1st National Action Plan - to be informed and voted
on by civil society;
· Co-create project plan for the development of the 1st Irish OGP
Action Plan and project plan for seeing through the achievement of these
commitments during the next 2 years;
Suggestion for Methodology with regards to project planning the Irish OGP
Action Plan and Civil Society Process
· SMART OGP Action Plan Commitments
· Decide on a number of commitments that can be achieved in 2yrs -
as opinions vary this will need to be socialised widely to those who may be
interested to input on this decision & should be open to the general public
· Options suggested by Government, Public Service and Civil Society
to date:
o 1st option: Limit the number of commitments to 8-15 & go through them
one by one making them smart.
o 2nd option: would be to include open data technology & innovation
commitments as well as 8-15 commitments that civil society votes as vital to
drive open government within Ireland.
o 3rd option: is to include open data technology & innovation
commitments as well as 8-15 commitments - one per each area of health,
education, election results, etc.
o 4th option: is to focus on implementing one main recommendation via the
OGP Action Plan during the next 2 years. E.G. the open data technology &
innovation challenge and build SMART actions around that. In parallel, one
could set a target to deal with a further 3-4 points in 2015, 2016, etc.
· Review any previous experiences with making goals SMART and draw
on expertise drawn from all areas civil society, government, public service
· Project Plan
o In order to be able to create a focussed, targeted and sound OGP Action
Plan we suggest:
o To develop a project plan for the next 4 month outlining, actions,
milestones, goals and resources assigned. The project plan will help to stay
on track, ensure the process is open and indicate cycles of meetings and
updates to be shared;
o Start work on a project plan for the 2 year period during which the OGP
Action Plan commitments will need to be achieved.
Thoughts on civil society engagement:
· Most importantly we are at a point where the Government can still
engage representatives of civil society in the process to ensure that the
Action Plan is broadly based and the diverse resources and perspectives
offered by CS can aid the government’s process. Open engagement to whoever
would like to participate is not necessarily something that civil society
needs to organise single handedly and is raised herein to emphasize that
this remains an opportunity to harness additional resources and truly
demonstrate the power of the ethos behind open government itself. It should
be in the interest of the Government to advertise as widely as possible and
to make it as easy as possible for anyone to participate, preferably online
and offline to get things started. If civil society manages to organize
itself in addition to that - even better!
· To further discuss how the civil society process can be conducted,
what role the Government and civil society should play we suggest to meet as
soon as possible. This may be useful even if no mandate has been finalised
by the Government, yet, as time is getting tight for putting a proper plan
in place. In fact we would suggest to plan out the civil society meetings
for the next couple of month to have a regular schedule in place.
Finally, would you be able to update the groups on the progress of the
following items? This will help us to keep track and support as needed.
· Any update on the progress Government and/or the assigned public
service staff have made regarding the drafting of the OGP Action Plan since
the update you provided on Dec. 5th?
· Specifically we are asking for an update on the following:
1. Signing up to the G8 Open Data Charter:
o Is there a timeline for when Ireland will sign up? We’d like to point
out that according to the G8 Open Data Charter postcodes should be
<https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-data-charter/g8-open-data-c
harter-and-technical-annex> ‘open’. Ireland’s plan for only opening up
Postcode Data for a charge
<http://www.thejournal.ie/postcodes-businesses-1173470-Nov2013/>
contradicts this. Is the government working on a solution to open this data
up as recommended by the G8 Open Data Charter? We have also noted that
‘Signing up to the G8 Open Data Charter’ is not part of the ‘Action Plan for
Public Service Reform 2014 - 2016’. Our recommendation is to have a written
Government commitment to achieve this within the next 2 years.
1. Establishing an Irish Open Data Board & Establishing a Steering &
Implementation group
o The Action Plan for Public Service Reform 2014-2016 states that this
process is ongoing. At this time is there any information how this board may
be selected or elected? The plan also states these will be in place by Q2.
As we will likely be in contact it would be great if you could share
additional information. Thanks!
1. Building an Open Data Platform
o The Action Plan for Public Service Reform 2014-2016 states that this
process is ongoing and also for a platform to be in place in Q2 / 2014. We
are recommending to use the CKAN portal which is open source and for which
documentation exists for developers to be able to get this up and running
fast. Could you please advise on current developments and next steps? Thank
you!
Again, an initial meeting to start the organisation process seems to be the
best way forward and we look forward to participate & work together on the
drafting of Ireland’s 1st OGP Action Plan.
Kind Regards,
Flora Fleischer
Co-Founder, OKF Ireland
m: +353851587423 I @daydreamer2105 <https://twitter.com/Daydreamer2105> |
<http://irl.okfn.org/> irl.okfn.org
Open data - the 21st century public library <http://www.opendata.ie/>
www.opendata.ie
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:57 AM, McCann, Conor <Conor.McCann at per.gov.ie>
wrote:
Dear Denis,
Thank you for your email, and for bringing our attention to the
establishment of the OGP Ireland ‘Crowdhall’. We will take note of any
recommendations that emerge from the group.
Regarding Nat O’Connor’s letter, please see the attached email, which
contains our response to Nat – issued on December 5.
Regards,
Conor
From: denis.parfenov at gmail.com [mailto:denis.parfenov at gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Denis Parfenov
Sent: 08 January 2014 08:48
To: McCann, Conor
Cc: open-data-ireland at googlegroups.com;
open-government-ireland at googlegroups.com; <okfn-irl at lists.okfn.org>;
admin at ogpireland.ie; Martinez, Claire; Nat O'Connor; Beausang, William
Subject: Re: Next Steps for OGP in Ireland?
*Apologies for any cross-posting*
Dear Conor,
Once again, thank you for sharing news regarding the plans to hold the
<http://per.gov.ie/2014/01/06/ireland-to-host-open-government-partnership-og
p-europe-regional-meeting-in-2014/> OGP Europe Regional Meeting in Dublin in
May 2013. I believe we have a fantastic opportunity to increase awareness
about OGP and opportunities for Open Data in Ireland.
I would like to draw your attention to an absence of response on
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/open-government-ireland/x3rsP2DwW
q0> Nat O’Connor’s letter dated 22nd November 2013, where an ad-hoc group of
civil society members outlined a suggested way forward in terms of the
collaboration between government and civil society on the development of the
first Irish National Action plan.
Also, I would like to bring to your attention that at the meeting between
DPER and representatives of civil society on
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/open-government-ireland/3XxjHe22a
Jo> June 26th we discussed the importance of public deliberation online.
Subsequently, we looked at suitability of
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/open-government-ireland/3XxjHe22a
Jo> four platforms suggested by the OGP and Global Integrity and established
that <http://crowdhall.com/> http://crowdhall.com/ is the most adequate for
us. As a result we have set up an instance of ‘Crowdhall’ specifically for
the Irish OGP consultation process: <http://crowdhall.com/h/52>
http://crowdhall.com/h/52
This platform can be useful for the public online deliberation of the 62+10
<http://per.gov.ie/open-government-partnership-ogp/> suggestions generated
during the initial consultation process that took place between July and
September 2013. Crowdhall allows for the generation of a unique URL for each
one of the action plan items. This can facilitate a public deliberation on
each commitment online and an ability for civil society to rate and rank
commitments.
For example, Fingal County Council: Submission to Open Government
Partnership Ireland Consultation: <https://crowdhall.com/h/52/p/402>
https://crowdhall.com/h/52/p/402 (tweet:
<https://twitter.com/opengovIRL/status/420663295754792960>
https://twitter.com/opengovIRL/status/420663295754792960)
I hope this is helpful.
Best regards,
Denis Parfenov
--
Denis Parfenov // OKF Ambassador for Ireland // m: +353863850044
<tel:%2B353863850044> // @ <https://twitter.com/prfnv> prfnv //
<http://okfirl.org/> http://okfirl.org/
The Open Knowledge Foundation Empowering through Open Knowledge
<http://okfn.org/> http://okfn.org/
On 22 November 2013 15:19, Nat O'Connor <natoconnor at gmail.com> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Nat O'Connor <noconnor at tascnet.ie>
Date: Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:09 PM
Subject: Next Steps for OGP in Ireland?
To: "Beausang, William(William.Beausang at per.gov.ie)"
<William.Beausang at per.gov.ie>
Cc: admin at ogpireland.ie, communications at ogpireland.ie,
okfn-irl at lists.okfn.org, open-data-ireland at googlegroups.com,
open-government-ireland at googlegroups.com, "evelyn.o'connor at per.gov.ie
<mailto:evelyn.o%27connor at per.gov.ie> " <evelyn.o'connor at per.gov.ie
<mailto:evelyn.o%27connor at per.gov.ie> >, "Martinez, Claire"
<Claire.Martinez at per.gov.ie>, "McCann, Conor" <Conor.McCann at per.gov.ie>
William Beausang
Head of Government Reform Unit and Civil Service HR Policy Division
Department of Public Expenditure and Reform
CC various mailing lists
BCC (private) 43 individual email addresses of interested people
Apologies for any cross-posting
Dear William,
Further to the meeting between members of civil society and your team
(October 25th), where
it was suggested that we propose a process to inform your unit’s submission
to a Government meeting before late November. I’m conscious that time is
pressing on this.
At our discussion at the October meeting, I recall that a potential impasse
was identified. Civil society has put forward 71 recommended actions;
however the Government has yet to put forward their own list of proposed
actions, derived from the Programme for Government and from civil service
suggestions from the relevant Departments. We risk getting bogged down if
either side wants to stick to their preferred list and go through each item
one after the other in exhaustive detail.
You noted that the national OGP Action Plans are meant to be short documents
and you suggested that we begin the Irish Action Plan with a higher level
narrative text, informed by both lists of proposed actions. Out of this
higher level text, we would then derive a set of SMART actions for the first
plan. These would differ in detail from some of the proposals from either
side, but they would hopefully address a large number of them and provide a
basis for substantive progress on some of the OGP goals. (I would add, this
should not close down further discussion on any proposals from civil
society).
Based on this, the following is a suggestion from me. I benefited from
feedback by email from the various colleagues but any remaining
errors/omissions are my own:
Proposed Process for Civil Society and Government Joint Working on Ireland’s
OGP Plan
1. We want a process that leads to a jointly-drafted Action Plan
between civil society and Government;
2. A steering group drawn from civil society needs to be established
to provide continuity of contact between wider civil society and the
Government. We need a small number of volunteers to commit to attending a
regular number of meetings between now and April 2014, to engage with the
Government on jointly-drafting the first Irish Action Plan;
3. The Government needs to commit to a series of meetings between now
and April 2014 to work jointly on the first Irish OGP Action Plan;
4. All formal records of the process (e.g. Agendas, Minutes) should be
posted online in a timely fashion after each meeting, so that wider civil
society and the general public can access them and monitor the process;
5. Members of civil society have been consulted by Transparency
International Ireland, leading to a report containing 62 recommended actions
(some of which are multiple actions). Another 9 additional actions were
submitted in parallel to this process, leading to a total of 71 civil
society proposed actions (some of which have multiple aspects to them);
6. The Government is to produce a list of its own proposed actions for
inclusion in the OGP Action Plan;
7. The first meeting of the Joint Government-Civil Society OGP
Steering Group (hereafter Steering Group) should agree headers for high
level narrative text within the first Action Plan – drawing on experience
from other countries’ plans;
8. These headers should be elaborated with text that accurately
reflects the diverse ideas and the overall direction of travel indicated in
the TI report of the civil society consultations. It should equally
represent the Programme for Government/civil service proposals;
9. Based on the high level text, subsequent meetings of the Steering
Group should agree SMART actions to be included in the first Action Plan;
10. A draft Action Plan should then be published with sufficient time for
wider civil society and the general public to make comments and suggestions;
11. The joint Steering Group than should meet to agree the final plan text
for submission to the OGP Summit in April.
12. Periodic meetings of the joint Steering Group should continue to
monitor progress on the plan, and prepare for its renewal.
Come April 2014, no one is likely to be perfectly happy with the resultant
Action Plan, however I would hope that it would lead to the best possible
compromise and provide a solid basis to see some new open government actions
implemented that go beyond what was anticipated in the Programme for
Government.
Likewise, I would hope that the process would provide a basis for working
together and with Government on open government that would be sustainable
throughout the lifetime of the plan.
There is already work ongoing to form a series of thematic working groups
(following similar topics to the ones being formed at international level in
OGP) and other existing groups (e.g. Aarhus Roadshow) could be seen as
relevant stakeholders equivalent to working groups too, so that everyone
interested in a given topic has an opportunity to voice their suggestions
and concerns between meetings of the Steering Group. Facilitating this and
attending relevant working groups would be an additional commitment required
of anyone volunteering to join the Steering Group.
As you know, two significant things have occurred subsequently to our
October meeting. Firstly, some civil society people attended the two-day
global Open Government Partnership summit in London (31st Oct/1st Nov),
which was preceded for those who could attend by civil society meetings and
open data meetings earlier in the week. Secondly, there has been a major
public dispute about FOI fees and a real risk that the amended FOI Act will
increase the barriers to FOI usage through higher costs associated with
non-personal FOI requests, which runs counter to the goals of the OGP.
The summit provided lots of useful information and examples of how OGP is
working in other countries; the pitfalls as well as the success stories. It
was good to see your colleagues Evelyn O’Connor and Claire Martinez there. I
heard Minister Howlin speak supportively about OGP at the European Caucus
and when addressing the panel on whistleblower protection. There seems to be
a vibrant international movement for OGP – but one limited by resources and
still in its fragile early stages.
In relation to the dispute about FOI up-front fees, I would be remiss if I
didn’t say that many activists are angry and feel a lack of trust, which
extends in some cases to the wider OGP process. I personally believe that
up-front FOI fees are a barrier to democratic participation and should be
abolished.
But OGP is about more than FOI, and it is important that Ireland puts in
place a robust process for civil society engagement with Government about
our first OGP Action Plan, and its implementation and annual renewal. This
process should be solid enough to permit us to have a serious debate with
Government about the merits and demerits of FOI fees, without allowing this
issue to block further progress on the other 70 proposed actions from the
OGP consultancy process.
I hope this proposal is of use in moving things forward. I would welcome
your comments on it and I look forward to hearing from you.
Kind regards,
Nat
Nat O'Connor MA PhD
Director
TASC – Think-tank for Action on Social Change
Second Floor, Castleriver House, 14-15 Parliament Street
Dublin 2, Ireland
Tel: +353 1 6169050 <tel:%2B353%201%206169050>
Email: noconnor at tascnet.ie
Web: www.tascnet.ie
Blog: www.progressive-economy.ie <http://www.progressive-economy.ie/>
Research and Organisation Services Ltd. TA/ TASC. Registered Address: Hill
House, 26 Sion Hill Road, Drumcondra, Dublin 9. Company No. 342993. CHY
14778.
_______________________________________________
okfn-irl mailing list
okfn-irl at lists.okfn.org
https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-irl
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-irl/attachments/20140127/29fdb542/attachment-0005.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2081 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-irl/attachments/20140127/29fdb542/attachment-0005.gif>
More information about the okfn-irl
mailing list