[okfn-labs] http://okfnlabs.org has been refreshed

Wed Mar 21 12:38:11 UTC 2012

Plenty of agreement from me on all points. I dont think we'll need to run
off the spreadsheet any longer -- it was a useful experiment and helped get
the thing booted, but it'll now become a hindrance to base page content off
the sheet structure. Using a DB backend might be overkill for now -- say
Gregor wants to embed a JS demo or I want to add some custom widget, it's
all much easier if we can write to the per-project HTML file directly.
Jekyll is doing a neat job of saving any markup being duplicated, I'm happy
with it for now.

I keep promising to blog and then I never do. If we start one now, will it
quickly go cold?

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Friedrich Lindenberg <
friedrich.lindenberg at okfn.org> wrote:

> This is brilliant, great work guys!
>
> Whats the thought on a blog? I wrote up a data journey recently [1] and it
> turned out to be a lot of fun to document this …
>
> - Friedrich
>
> [1] http://pudo.org/2012/03/15/wga.html
>
> On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Gregor Aisch wrote:
>
>
> Am 21.03.2012 um 13:14 schrieb Rufus Pollock:
>
> I think we could even be a lot more selective (perhaps stop running
> off that spreadsheet or just slim down a lot ...)
>
>
> Why not replace the Google spreadsheet with CKAN webstore?
>
> Should be possible, shouldn't it?
>
> –G
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-labs mailing list
> okfn-labs at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-labs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-labs mailing list
> okfn-labs at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-labs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-labs/attachments/20120321/18f9e347/attachment-0002.html>